Combined Flu jab
- Thread starter Vulcan
- Start date
Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:
- Status
I don’t believe he was. But what’s your view on the Nurses that refused the vaccination? Some lost their jobs and many others protested about mandatory vaccination at the time.
https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/c...-mandatory-covid-19-vaccine-rules-25-01-2022/
I suspect many are still unvaccinated.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
We've seen this already and it's still rubbish.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
They are only human and unfortunately can also be influenced by the nutters.
Have there been any actual studies of the nutters and those susceptible to their siren call? It could be worthwhile - there might be a vaccine!
Last edited:
Drifter2406
Established Member
Name calling, really? Did you ever have an open mind to listen to someone that goes against something you believe?
I suppose your flippant comment also applies to Doctors?
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/98196
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
An obscure USA survey, but even if the dubious 10% figure is correct it is simply more likely that the 90% are more reliable.
As this Doctor says, If Covid vaccines are so affective how do you explain this?
https://www.youtube.com/live/6z4oAgRCySc?si=0-qoN_foBwHQvlhQ
https://www.youtube.com/live/6z4oAgRCySc?si=0-qoN_foBwHQvlhQ
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
I have been listening!
It's the nutters who don't, or who simply fail to understand. Small minority luckily.
Last edited:
It’s not just in the USA. NHS doctors have also refused the vaccine but nobody wants to document the numbers for some reason.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
Easy - just another pseudo-science nutter. Why do you think this chap has more insight than the huge worldwide majority of medicos who would not agree with him?
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
How do you know this? Can you provide a link?
Would expect there to be a tiny margin of sceptics, c'est la vie.
From WIkipedia:
John Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator known for his videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, the videos received praise, but they later diverged into COVID-19 misinformation.[2][3] He has been criticised for suggesting COVID-19 deaths have been over-counted,[4] repeating false claims about the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, and providing misleading commentary about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.[5]
Just to be clear, he's not a medical doctor - the "Dr." bit is from a Phd he did on teaching via digital media (university of Bolton).. He was for many years a nurse practitioner and taught nursing. Recently, one of his videos claiming that there were more excess deaths amongst folk who'd been vaccinated against COVID-19 was debunked on "More or Less" (the opposite was true) and after contact from the BBC, he withdrew it, stating that he wasn't a statistician... which begs the question why he was making such claims (based on statistics) when he knew there was a good chance he was wrong? Other claims he made in early 2024 about blood clots in cadavers were also debunked.
There's a lot more - a long history of false claims - but mostly he seems to peddle conspiracy theories to those susceptible to selection bias and who aren't capable of thinking (specifically, thinking critically) for themselves.
Personally, I feel it's both dishonest & intentionally misleading to use the title "Dr." when commenting in a medical context when you don't have the relevant medical qualifications - you should postfix your name with "Phd". Even with the postfix, it would still be more honest to make it clear what your qualifications actually are, especially if your doctorate was non-medical, e.g. in this case, digital media-related.
Last edited:
Krome10
Established Member
I think you're moving the goalposts. Your post suggested that people who choose not to have a vaccine are selfish by potentially putting an extra strain on the NHS.
I replied with other examples of activities and choices which likewise put an extra strain on the NHS and could likewise be considered selfish.
I'm not sure how your response as quoted above has any logical relevance.
artie
Sawdust manufacturer.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
That is the problem in a nutshell! (no pun intended)
You just need to work at it yourself a lot more.
Another interesting video that popped up a few days ago.
https://www.youtube.com/live/LLuFd45uADQ?si=kD3lundLPXqA70jo
https://www.youtube.com/live/LLuFd45uADQ?si=kD3lundLPXqA70jo
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
More frauds and nutters.
It is a weird phenomenon and should be studied in itself. Who, why, what, etc.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
Not that many in reality. It's like climate change scepticism; something like 99% of scientists support the man-made climate change hypothesis. The 1% remaining may well number in thousands, but so what?
- Status
