CNC rpm & feed

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
somethings not quite right there. face operations should remove all of the top face of your stock. i reckon you have a geometry selected that you shouldnt for that toolpath. leaving it there potentially presents material to your next toolpath that it isnt expecting to be there. if its cutting into the middle of that stock expecting to cut at 7mm deep, with that extra material there that cut may be 8mm or more depending on how flat your stock is to start with.
yes I thought it was odd too, but I have found the correct setting
1727792594619.png

but here is where it gets frustrating, to cover the whole surface I need to select "Outer Loops" if I select "All Loops" it misses the middle bit out
1727793119546.png
 
the following 'tapered holes' was from a CAM that I made from a 3d drawing in Fusion, the simulation works perfectly in Fusion, however it fails on the CNC Router by making the holes too big - and I can see from the toolpath on the CNC Router where it has gone wrong (my red pointers)

what could cause this error?

1728066889618.png
 
Looks weird, I'd guess theres an issue with the geometry selected for the hole. What tool path strategy did you choose?
 
Yes there will be a more appropriate toolpath like bore or something more suited to holes. I'm not Infront of a pc at the moment to advise definite terminology but try a different type of tool path.
 
If you are going to use a cnc router to level a warped disc (400mm dia)
would you just create a linear path that goes from side to side, or would you try and make a climb cut all the way around the edge before the linear passes and how much woud you come down with each pass 1mm? and is there a minimun pass on wood?
1729514688423.png

(i have run a hand plane over this just to take the high bit off)
 
I would draw a circle a couple of mm larger than the disk and use an area clearance toolpath to machine the disk
Depending on the software you have you may have an option to take liner passes along X or you may have an option for a spiral tool path starting on the outside and working into the centre
What size bit are you looking to use? as this will dictate what you min and max depth of cut should be along with the amount of step over per pass
Personally I would use either a carbide spoil board flattening cutter 1 1/4 dia with around .5mm depth of cut and around a 50% step over
Another option would be a 1/4 spiral down cut anything between .5mm and 6mm depth of cut and again around a 50% step over.
Depth of cut, spindle speed, cutting speed and stepover will all be dependent on your machine, your spindle, your cutters and how you are securing the disk.
Hope This Helps
 
I would draw a circle a couple of mm larger than the disk and use an area clearance toolpath to machine the disk
Depending on the software you have you may have an option to take liner passes along X or you may have an option for a spiral tool path starting on the outside and working into the centre
What size bit are you looking to use? as this will dictate what you min and max depth of cut should be along with the amount of step over per pass
Personally I would use either a carbide spoil board flattening cutter 1 1/4 dia with around .5mm depth of cut and around a 50% step over
Another option would be a 1/4 spiral down cut anything between .5mm and 6mm depth of cut and again around a 50% step over.
Depth of cut, spindle speed, cutting speed and stepover will all be dependent on your machine, your spindle, your cutters and how you are securing the disk.
Hope This Helps
Thanks for that - I am very limited with the tooling for this machine (if I get going with and show that I can use it they will buy whatever I need)
so what I was going to use for this experiment was a 19mm bit like this
1729536417962.png

was going to use a 12mm step-over (cut 12mm every pass) and cut 1 mm off
Using Fusion and its setting it to 5000rpm with 500mm/min ?
This is all very experimental to me so any advice / pointers would be much appreciated.
 
does your machine have the ability to adjust the feed during the cut? 19mm bit, 12mm step over at 1mm deep sounds fine. id be tempted to speed up the rpm say 10000 and start at 500mm/min although i reckon this would be a bit slow and infuriating to watch. if you can manually overide the feed up a bit til your comfortable id do that.
my little desktop machine ran a 25mm surfacing bit at 1500mm/min at 2mm depth in oak this weekend with no issue so if your machine is of the workshop variety it will chew through a couple of mm no problem.
you'll probably see a little tear out at the edges, try and run your toolpath parallel with with the grain of the wood.
id use the face operation in fusion, it will do half the work for you. if you model the disc to the finished height you want but make your stock a couple mm thicker you should be good..
 
below was last weekends mission repairing an antique chair for my father in law. i used an app, reality scan, to to create a 3d model of a similar intact pair of cherubs and then scaled it to hopefully fit the gap. about 8 hours of machining in oak.


PXL_20241020_135157475.jpgPXL_20241013_105842783.MP.jpgPXL_20241019_163856774.MP.jpgPXL_20241019_142615596.MP.jpg
 
Back
Top