ydb1md":2e970blp said:
This is actually a great time for woodworkers -- neanders in general.
In general? Or in particular?
I don't disagree; I just wish, with so many types of plane (in particular :wink: ) to consider making, they were making
different ones. And before Rob starts; I know, I know, they're quite different, you're not in competition, yadda yadda. :roll: Tell that to Neander X who wants a router plane (f'rinstance); is he/she
really gonna say "I can fully justify having one of each 'cos they're both so different". I'd like to see them try that one of their S/HWMBO... :lol: Not to mention the untold thousands of old ones there are available, and for not much money, which actually
work anyway. How can you really improve it? More to the point
why bother? Tsk, I'm ranting again; it's the fact a grooving/dadoing/rebating whatevering doesn't seem to be under consideration - seriously - by either of them that gets me. Now a skewed dado plane, f'rinstance, that'd be worth making. Not exactly easily had at the moment, are they?
ydb1md":2e970blp said:
Have you read the newest issue of Popular Woodworking?
Chuckle. I dare say it may turn up some time before next Christmas, but that may be a triumph of hope over experience...
ydb1md":2e970blp said:
With Rob Lee coming out with so many new designs that combine quality and innovation, I think that Lie Nielsen has been spurred on to improve his game as well.
By releasing an iron version of the #102, which appears to be a direct competitor to the Veritas apron plane*, and a medium shoulder plane... :-k
*
pace Rob; I know. No competition going on etc etc :-$ :wink:
ydb1md":2e970blp said:
The ones that benefit are all of us. At the beginning of the last century, Stanley dominated the iron plane market. Now, we have two great manufacturers to choose from, in addition to the plethora of vintage tools available to us.
I really do hope it'll carry on like that, but I worry that the market is really pretty small, and someone is going to suffer from the not-really-competition. But I hope I'm very, very wrong about that.
Cheers, Alf