cedarwood":3bzgtu8h said:So with all these so called harmful gases and whatever pollutants are airborne WHY are people LIVING longer than our ancestors ever did, bloomin politicians and daft scientists and their statistics. (hammer)
MIGNAL":g3a55r2l said:cedarwood":g3a55r2l said:So with all these so called harmful gases and whatever pollutants are airborne WHY are people LIVING longer than our ancestors ever did, bloomin politicians and daft scientists and their statistics. (hammer)
Maybe it's because scientists/doctors discovered that smoking, asbestos and other air pollutants weren't very good for the old bellows. There's a small matter of better/advanced healthcare as well. Blaming the EU on highlighting high levels of a pollutant in UK Cities is just plain dumb.
Traffic fumes across the country are provoking increased instances of asthma and other respiratory diseases. So what is being done about it?
...
Air pollution, especially from diesel engines, is a "neglected, hidden killer" and children and old people are especially at risk, says Mudway. "There's strong evidence that if you live near main roads you will have smaller lungs," he says. "They will not reach capacity and will be stunted. When, or if, people move to a cleaner environment they still do not recover the function they lost.
...
He lists some of the effects of polluted air. In the short term, it leads to irritation to the eyes, nose and throat, headaches, nausea, bronchitis and pneumonia. Over a longer period it can result in heart attacks and lung diseases, cancers, even damage to the brain, nerves, liver, and kidneys.
...
The more researchers like Mudway look at the health effects of air pollution, the worse it seems to get. The latest figures suggest 29,000 people die prematurely from it every year in Britain, twice as many as from road traffic, obesity and alcohol combined, and that air pollution is now second only to smoking as a cause of death.
...
tekno.mage":2bupfplb said:What I don't understand is why there are increases in the number of cases of asthma now. Air quality is *so* much better than it was 40 or 50 years ago when there was heavy industry belching goodness knows what into the atmosphere, smokey coal fires used for domestic heating, lead in petrol, filthy old deisel buses and lorries etc etc, despite the increase in number of vehicles on the road. I remember working in London 25 years ago and blowing one's nose after a day "in the smoke" (mostly spent in an air-conditioned office, with just the walk to the tube station exposing me directly to the traffic fumes) resulted in black stuff in the hanky! It's especially odd when you consider that 40 - 50 years ago kids played outside a lot more than they do now, so potentially were more exposed to really nasty fumes and particles.
Jacob":1thf6x8g said::lol: :lol:
Have you tried jumping off a cliff MMUK? They say the risks are wildly exaggerated; it's a lot safer than it looks.
Scaremongers everywhere and elf n safety gorn mad. :roll:
MMUK":2gs4lh7h said:Personally, I take a lot of these so-called reports with a pinch of salt. There are so many other factors involved that they seem to wilfully ignore.
Just take asbestos as an example. Most of the hype created about the subject is scaremongering and bull dung. It's no more dangerous to your health than MDF and yet MDF hasn't been outlawed.
It's all lies coming from European vested interests - it's a well known fact that asbestos dust is good for you, along with lead, tobacco, diesel fumes, arsenic etc. etc.riclepp":ie1vw9q0 said:MMUK":ie1vw9q0 said:Personally, I take a lot of these so-called reports with a pinch of salt. There are so many other factors involved that they seem to wilfully ignore.
Just take asbestos as an example. Most of the hype created about the subject is scaremongering and bull dung. It's no more dangerous to your health than MDF and yet MDF hasn't been outlawed.
Errr how do you work that out in regards to asbestos???? (asking as an asbestos surveyor)
Enter your email address to join: