Wild fires in BC Canada.

[Fergie 307]

There is an argument that we are also responsible for the unusual relatively steady state of the recent holocene 10000 years which roughly coincides with the development of agriculture. Now ended as we arrive at the "anthropocene" and rapid change.
https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/quaternar...eatly influenced the,as our species is doing.https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/anthropocene/

Never entirely seen that argument, and there are many who don't agree with it, bearing in mind that there have been a number of similar periods of relatively little change throughout the record, and long before we were about. There are also significant blips in both directions even during this period, which there surely ought not to be if we were responsible for some kind of dampening effect. Seems to me that you can pick out any number of similar periods, and some much longer, where you will see the same thing. So I am not convinced that, as far as the Holocene period is concerned, it is any more than a coincidence. I agree entirely with you about it's end, and our contribution to the next phase.

 

[Jacob]

Never entirely seen that argument, and there are many who don't agree with it,

Do a bit more reading it's very interesting.

 

[Fergie 307]

Take your pick is meat production bad for climate change - Google Search

I've no reason to do anything of the sort. Why would I bother I'm interested in what is going on around me and follow the science. Have been since I was at school about 65 years ago. Not interested in the fantasy land of conspiracy theories. It's not really a two sided argument to start with, the de-bunkers are a tiny irrelevant minority.
Is there any evidence that meat consumption is good for the climate?
https://www.google.com/search?q=is+...j0i546i649.11055j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

I wasn't necessarily referring to the subject at hand, more a general observation on your apparent tendency to frame your searches in such a way that you will find information that supports your existing point of view.
Your reply demonstrates this far more eloquently than I ever could. Never mind.

 

[Jacob]

I wasn't necessarily referring to the subject at hand, more a general observation on your apparent tendency to frame your searches in such a way that you will find information that supports your existing point of view.

No it just comes up that way however you ask the question. My point of view (shared with millions) follows the science it isn't something I've conjured up for myself. Try doing it yourself! Ask a few questions. Stop listening to the nutters!