This is a fairly objective summary of EU democratic processes - although of somewhat academic interest now that we have left.
EU democracy
There are weaknesses - different to our own (UK) but the takeaway is that:
- the UK places responsibility for the actions of government on elected MPs - the professional unelected Civil Service actually do the work and remain largely unaccountable.
- The EU Commision are unelected full time bureaucrats but accountable to MEPs.
- The EU council of Ministers has a representative appointed by each member nation and are thus the outcome of a democratic process
IMHO the EU approach is superior to the UK in placing responsibility on professional permanent civil servants, not MPs who are frequently in post for a limited period, have limited relevant experience, and whose actions are conditioned by opinion polls.
BTW - whilst I voted to remain, we sacrificed independence through treaty changes - creating a potential federation whose role expanded massively from an economic and market alliance.
Far from being a bastion of mature democracy the UK has real weaknesses in the role and appointment of a second chamber (HoL), uses FPTP rather than PR, and sacrifices coherent long term direction as MPs actions are dominated by immediate opinion polls.
The problems of being 1 of 28 in the EU is no different to the tensions created within the UK England, Scotland, Wales, NI) and at a lower level still - between central government, local government, unitary authorities, town and local councils.
To get the benefits of being part of a larger central organisation inevitably means sacrificing some degree of independence.