J-G
Established Member
Agreed - it was my interest in the mathematics of Conic sections that started me thinking about how to turn Elliptical work.dcmguy":1zw6b3ml said:It's a fun subject for those who are so inclined! (I happen to have a degree in maths so quite enjoy thinking about it).
It's good to see that there is a reference to the correct nomenclature on the first page of the Volmer web-site.dcmguy":1zw6b3ml said:As for semantics between oval and ellipse ... my guess is that folk refer to oval as its a more readily understood concept than 'ellipse' ...the latter being typically defined by a mathematical equation ...and maths often has a habit of making folks fall asleep!
Ah... we are obviously of a kindred spirit! - - - I'm in the process of building an Orrery so have done a lot of research on how to handle the scale. Only Mercury and Pluto (Ok dwarf-planet!) have a high enough eccentricity (M = 0.2056, P= 0.2553) to make any visible difference on a manageable model.dcmguy":1zw6b3ml said:(by way of illustration of irrational ambition .. I have in mind a set of scaled nested oval bowls to try to represent the planetary orbits in our solar system...which..when reflected on... is non-trivial without excessive simplification!... maybe I'll develop the skills and creativity to do this nicely one day!)
I'd now normally list the relative model sizes of the orbits but I can feel the reader nodding off ! :lol: