For good or bad, some observations as I see it in the bandsaw/tablesaw thing:
Making lots of square things - tablesaw
Making curved things - bandsaw
Lots of workshop space - tablesaw
Limited space - bandsaw
Lots of money and space - both
Willing to remove guards - tablesaw
Safety conscious - bandsaw
Hand tool user - bandsaw (fwiw I regard mine as a powered handsaw)
Predominantly sheet goods - tablesaw (if you have the room for the necessary support. If you don't then you're probably better off with a circular saw and guide system)
Soild wood - bandsaw (thinner kerf for less wastage for a start. Re-sawing, cutting joints etc)
FWIW it seems to me a tablesaw, unless you're happy to remove guards and start utilising it for cutting joints etc, really doesn't score very well in the value-for-space-taken stakes. But then I seldom do dozens of identical cuts, never mind runs of the same project. For me, using hardwoods on one-off projects and everything getting finished off with hand tools anyway, the bandsaw's flexibility will always win. But that's just me. If I need it I can always use the circular saw and cutting guide to do tablesaw tasks on sheet goods, and the SCMS does all the accurate crosscutting I desire. But if someone wanted me to make a load of veneered plywood carcasses I'm pretty well stuffed. It really is horses for courses.
Oh, and never assume someone's comparing apples with apples when they diss the bandsaw in comparison with the tablesaw. Often it turns out to be a comparison between a £200 benchtop bandsaw and a T/S costing at least five tmes as much, which is hardly fair.
Cheers, Alf