So, I’ve finally got around to sorting some planes, they’ve all been stored under wax paper type coverings, so relatively free of corrosion, first one out was a Stanley No 10 Carriage plane, just required a brush off and light clean.
The next is this Stanley 4 1/2. I believe it’s a type 7, majority of features suggest this, however couple of things feel strange on it.
Firstly, I had thought the early types had low knobs, some online studies suggest this to be the case, and an important factor to identify, whilst others don’t seem to mark this distinction as so important. This plane has a high knob, of course, it could be a later replacement, but did early Stanley’s have high knobs as well as low? Both knob and tote have the same names on. So have been together for a considerable time.
The small brass adjuster is stamped Baileys Patent & 2 dates, which according
Plane Feature Timeline
was a feature of type 6, but not a type 7.
Possibly likely as a change was made, the old brass adjuster wheels continued to be used until stock exhausted ?
The bed is cast with an ‘S’ behind the frog, as is the lever cap, several sites are clear that where a bed is cast with an ‘S’, that this firmly establishes the type as a 7.
It also has a cap iron mark ‘ L Bailey Patent dec 24 1867 ‘ there’s online reference to this mark on the type 1 planes and the mark was carried forward onto later types, but not when this was ended. Again Hperkitten site.
Would like to know this plane is not a ‘bits-er’ if it is, it was done a long time ago as it’s not seen daylight in since approx early 1960s. It’s actually not in too bad shape for over 100 yrs old, uses well, I’ve a lovely Record already, so another 4.1/2
I don’t really need, but hard to dismiss one of this age and it prob has a value to someone.
Anyway, any Stanley experts shed any further light or thoughts?
Would like to know this plane is not a ‘bits-er’ if it is, it was done a long time ago as it’s not seen daylight in since approx early 1960s. It’s actually not in too bad shape for over 100 yrs old, uses well, I’ve a lovely Record already, so another 4.1/2
I don’t really need, but hard to dismiss one of this age and it prob has a value to someone.
Anyway, any Stanley experts shed any further light or thoughts?
The next is this Stanley 4 1/2. I believe it’s a type 7, majority of features suggest this, however couple of things feel strange on it.
Firstly, I had thought the early types had low knobs, some online studies suggest this to be the case, and an important factor to identify, whilst others don’t seem to mark this distinction as so important. This plane has a high knob, of course, it could be a later replacement, but did early Stanley’s have high knobs as well as low? Both knob and tote have the same names on. So have been together for a considerable time.
The small brass adjuster is stamped Baileys Patent & 2 dates, which according
Plane Feature Timeline
was a feature of type 6, but not a type 7.
Possibly likely as a change was made, the old brass adjuster wheels continued to be used until stock exhausted ?
The bed is cast with an ‘S’ behind the frog, as is the lever cap, several sites are clear that where a bed is cast with an ‘S’, that this firmly establishes the type as a 7.
It also has a cap iron mark ‘ L Bailey Patent dec 24 1867 ‘ there’s online reference to this mark on the type 1 planes and the mark was carried forward onto later types, but not when this was ended. Again Hperkitten site.
Would like to know this plane is not a ‘bits-er’ if it is, it was done a long time ago as it’s not seen daylight in since approx early 1960s. It’s actually not in too bad shape for over 100 yrs old, uses well, I’ve a lovely Record already, so another 4.1/2
I don’t really need, but hard to dismiss one of this age and it prob has a value to someone.
Anyway, any Stanley experts shed any further light or thoughts?
Would like to know this plane is not a ‘bits-er’ if it is, it was done a long time ago as it’s not seen daylight in since approx early 1960s. It’s actually not in too bad shape for over 100 yrs old, uses well, I’ve a lovely Record already, so another 4.1/2
I don’t really need, but hard to dismiss one of this age and it prob has a value to someone.
Anyway, any Stanley experts shed any further light or thoughts?
Last edited: