A
Anonymous
Guest
MikeW":zr8w5trt said:But, not that it matters. Unless one is making a plane and
I am 8)
Thanks for the spreadsheet Shady, much appreciated :wink:
Basically the bed angle should be the difference of subtracting the front to back bedding angle from the skew angle.
In the case of the LN 140, subtracting the 12 deg bed (back to front) from the skew angle of 18 deg leaves 6 deg. angle right (leading) to left (trailing).
Not sure I see what you mean here Mike. What is this 'bed angle' of 6 degrees?
2. I think Garrett Hack suggests that, because your effort is now going into a longer area of blade (the skew increases the length of edge in contact, all other things being equal), the 'force per unit length' equation changes in your favour. Seems counter-intuitive (ie, more fibres to cut, should be harder), but there we go.
Counter-intuitive and wrong acording to the Newton's laws of physics. The force spread across a greater area results in less force being applied to each fibre (given the same force from the user's hand). Also, the applied force and inertia force (opposite reaction force), which are vector quantities (have both magnitude and direction), are split into two components due to the skew. This reduces the force per fibre to an even smaller value. The 'force per unit length' equation does not change in your favour, just the opposite in fact.
I think the advantage is the slicing action alone which effectively reduces the force require to cut through the wood fibres.
This is easily demonstrated in the kitchen, cut a carrot by pressing down on the knife, and then cut it again by slicing across it with the same knife - same contact area but lower force required the second time.