Krome10
Established Member
Hi
Back again with a second wood stove query, if anyone would be kind enough to share their thoughts please...
We're planning to have a stove fitted into a single storey room. The stove has a 5" flue. The installers who have quoted said they think the flue will need to be a total height of 4.5m. It will be a straight run, no bends. If there were to be a single wall flue in the room up until where it has to change to twin to pass through the ceiling, the single wall section would be around 1.6 to 1.7m. The rest would be twin wall, although most of it would be outdoors.
We only burn well seasoned hardwoods.
From what I've learnt, the advantage of single wall would be more heat to the room. One installer said he thinks for each 1m of single wall flue you get 1kW of heat, which would be a great bonus. I'll also admit a bias - I think the stove looks so much nicer with the single wall 5" flue. I've only found a couple of photos online where the same stove has been installed with twin wall and to be honest I think it looks f-ugly. Also, more space on the stove top for a kettle etc would be an extra bonus.
However, I've also learnt that the advantage of twin wall is the flue maintains a higher internal heat, creating a better draw, which results in a stove that is easier to start, runs better, and a flue that doesn't block with creosote so much. (Although I should add that some say they have none of these problems with single wall).
It seems to be a very divided topic, with strong opinions on both sides. While I want the aesthetics and extra heat to sway me to single wall, I also don't want a stove that is tough to light and doesn't run well.
So over to you guys for some thoughts and insights...
Many thanks
Back again with a second wood stove query, if anyone would be kind enough to share their thoughts please...
We're planning to have a stove fitted into a single storey room. The stove has a 5" flue. The installers who have quoted said they think the flue will need to be a total height of 4.5m. It will be a straight run, no bends. If there were to be a single wall flue in the room up until where it has to change to twin to pass through the ceiling, the single wall section would be around 1.6 to 1.7m. The rest would be twin wall, although most of it would be outdoors.
We only burn well seasoned hardwoods.
From what I've learnt, the advantage of single wall would be more heat to the room. One installer said he thinks for each 1m of single wall flue you get 1kW of heat, which would be a great bonus. I'll also admit a bias - I think the stove looks so much nicer with the single wall 5" flue. I've only found a couple of photos online where the same stove has been installed with twin wall and to be honest I think it looks f-ugly. Also, more space on the stove top for a kettle etc would be an extra bonus.
However, I've also learnt that the advantage of twin wall is the flue maintains a higher internal heat, creating a better draw, which results in a stove that is easier to start, runs better, and a flue that doesn't block with creosote so much. (Although I should add that some say they have none of these problems with single wall).
It seems to be a very divided topic, with strong opinions on both sides. While I want the aesthetics and extra heat to sway me to single wall, I also don't want a stove that is tough to light and doesn't run well.
So over to you guys for some thoughts and insights...
Many thanks