dogmatic attachment to any one method is daft.
it would be super dandy at some point if people started comparing the results of their sharpening rather than their methods. $20 for a hand scope is a bridge too far, I guess.
I used to peruse a razor forum. I would antagonize (not intentionally) the group of method folks who had this that and the other comment about how poorly their straight razor would shave, hold up, or whatever else.
"I think you need a small hand held scope. I think you will find your problem as that you either have not honed all of the archaic damage from the edge of a razor last shaved with 50 years ago and then mishandled, or you'll find that you're sharpening lots of stuff most of the time, but getting an undamaged edge with the fine scratches reaching the edge on both sides after eliminating defects probably will fail to appear. When you make it appear, you'll be surprised how well the razor shaves"
"no way...you don't know what you're talking about.. I did a 5 stone progression with honing pyramids and there's no way I didn't reach the edge. The razor is defective, it's microchipping but it's possible that I overhoned it".
After a few months, a couple of people bought hand held scopes and taking pictures took off. None of them had finished their razors to the edge for various reasons (if you think it's hard to hone tools properly for beginners, imagine picking up an old straight razor and trying to reshape it and then hone it to a finish to the very tip from end to end on both sides - where you can't use much physical pressure).
Then it became standard to show results (pictures from a scope, and what magnification) and ask if they were good enough rather than ask about the method.
I still don't think most people on those forums have a clue what overhoned means, but that hobby sort of blew up about the same time that hand tool woodworking did, and there's a lot less in earnest done on both at this point.