NYNick":3403l148 said:
...Richard Maguire and Paul Sellers ...have different opinions on what is the best sharpening method.
You can pretty much insert the names of any two woodworkers and have it be equally true. Everyone and their aunt has an opinion on sharpening!
NYNick":3403l148 said:
Maguire uses a coarse diamond lapping plate and a Norton India oilstone, saying that diamond plates for the finer sharpening stages suck.
He's wrong. Right for him, but wrong as a statement of bland fact.
Truthfully, not a few of the brand-name finer diamond plates aren't great in one way or another that I don't want to get into because the fanboys will get bent out of shape (but I will say some just suck!) however, there
are perfectly good plates in the finer range, let's call it 1K and up. These finer plates are as suitable for achieving a decent edge as any other abrasive surface that's roughly equivalent in grit,
as illustrated by the decent edges people using them are getting, so proving Maguire is being hyperbolic if he actually used the words "they suck"
In addition to the obvious fact that they work, they abrade steel from an edge, diamonds have a couple of clear advantages over the alternatives, chief among them being
the abrasive is diamonds. Diamonds are much harder than their nearest equivalent – have to ignore CBN in this context – much further away than hardness tables imply. And this can be very evident in use, both in the immediate and in the long term.
There are numerous other important factors in sharpening-media performance but hardness of the abrasive is one key one.
NYNick":3403l148 said:
And Sellers further states that the trend toward hybridization (i.e. using a diamond plate and an oil stone or water stone) is “silly”.
See, I don't get this. Obviously Sellers has a vested interest in getting people to listen to him and trust what he's saying, but there's no reason to denigrate a system that's different to what you're teaching.
IMHO there's not only nothing wrong with using a hybrid system there's plenty to recommend it, depending on the user, where they are, what's available to them cheaply and other factors. But this is a complex, multi-layered message that isn't as easily digestible as a simple sharpen-by-numbers recommendation (which, let's be honest, is what a lot of people actually want).
It wouldn't be my first choice but I'd be perfectly happy to use diamond plates with a slate hone and water to finish off. This is what I use periodically when I feel like it, although my preference is to finish by stropping. The steel doesn't care either way! Which is to say, the final edge is about the same in both cases.
NYNick":3403l148 said:
These are strongly polar opposite opinions by respected masters in the field.
Wait till you look at pins versus tails first in dovetailing. These are just the tip of the iceberg.
NYNick":3403l148 said:
I was wondering if the members of this forum have weighed in on this.
Only about a bazillion times.
Have a look at page 2 of this forum. There's a sharpening thread there that began with an innocent question and yet it spawned a 22-page thread. This is not the worst example here as it's not primarily pointless back and forth and bitter argument, loads of good information was added as it went on. But still it could be trimmed of maybe 5-8 pages of fat. Other sharpening threads are more than 70% fat.
Now sharpening tends to be a hotly-debated topic everywhere, but here the noise-to-signal ratio is largely down to one troll who won't shut up. He might be taking an enforced break right about now but if not he'll likely be along shortly to cr*p all over your thread.