Stigmorgan
Established Member
Just watched last night's episode, the wrong person went home in my opinion.
He should never of attempted a river table in 2 days …plus he had little idea of how to do it. He should of ripped that slab down the centre and used with the waney edges as the river in the centre - but it’s a several days job done correctlyJust watched last night's episode, the wrong person went home in my opinion.
True but the slab on sticks was an abomination and that's who I think should have gone home.He should never of attempted a river table in 2 days …plus he had little idea of how to do it. He should of ripped that slab down the centre and used with the waney edges as the river in the centre - but it’s a several days job done correctly
thats half the problem with these competition type series, the production team try to inject drama into it by time constraints, and choose contestants based on personality, if you watched this hoping to learn something it wouldnt teach you a thing. id much rather watch a youtube video showing tools and techniques properly, although leo from hand i craft at least is a woodworker ,mind you theres plenty of youtube woodworkers with all the gear and no idea, you have to sift through the channels to find good ones. i watched a few episodes last year, the standard was godawful and i switched off. im a gardener and find the same annoyances with garden makeover programmes, any experienced landscaper could tell you the gardens they put together wont last or are badly constructed , its all about making it look finished for the cameras and to fit into a time format.Why ?
Great program, I love watching it.
Got to keep in mind none of them have 2 weeks to design a piece, nor 4+ weeks to make it. So the designs are innovative and look to solve the time constrain issues inherent in this type of series.
That is all part of the design process, a good woodworker would know what can be achieved in the given timeframe and make something accordingly. Then they would produce a good finished quality item.The problem for me though (and it's not really a problem because it adds drama) is that a lot of these contestants just try to take on too much in too little time. Sure, make a Carlton House desk - but in two days?? Get serious! Some of the designs are just way too ambitious, and I would prefer to see the contestants take on these challenges with a much more realistic timeframe.
It's a bit like that 'money for nothing' show on tv. They put the crafts people on it as 'Britain's elite craftsmen/women', but I've seen the work of the elite and they certainly arent itbut when you googled the contestants some were time served prize winning goldsmiths.
Ahh but who does ? Same with anything you design really. Starts off with an idea then drawing etc etc and etc. You learn by experiencing in a trial and error process.plus he had little idea of how to do it.
Try using a small router bit fitted into a collet on the spindle moulder, very very scary.
Let me translate that for you;Health and safety on the show became a real problem for those of us who love a bit of danger.
thats one of the most offputting things about the show for me. i was trying to figure out why i had such a love/hate with it, i like watching the builds, i've no assumptons on the skill levels of those computing being the best woodworkers. but every year at this time i watch masterchef the professionals and love it, and i was looking at why, and this is one glaring difference, in masterchef, the judges are absolute masters in their field and when they jduge, you know its coming from a position of experience and expertise.Unlike the first series the judges had poor knowledge of the discipline often talking nonsense, misnaming joints and techniques. At least in Series 1 Helen was an amazingly accomplished furniture maker that was highly respected. It was difficult to tell if builds were judged on design, technique or answering the brief as the judges were inconsistent throughout.
To be honest judging on the design and ‘appeal’ of the project is probably a much better approach than trying to judge joinery that has been rushed to an arbitrary timeline.thats one of the most offputting things about the show for me. i was trying to figure out why i had such a love/hate with it, i like watching the builds, i've no assumptons on the skill levels of those computing being the best woodworkers. but every year at this time i watch masterchef the professionals and love it, and i was looking at why, and this is one glaring difference, in masterchef, the judges are absolute masters in their field and when they jduge, you know its coming from a position of experience and expertise.
the two judges in this have no expertise, it's obvious they are being fed lines to say, especially the attempts to make the female judge comment on joinery at every opportunity when its obvious she has no idea what she is saying (and not bashing her, one look at her instagram shows she doesn;t do joinery in any of her work).
so no woodworker on the judges, an artist and a "design academic". no wonder that whenever any of the contestants doesn't get a bit of their design done it immediately becomes the most vital piece of the design, if you don't know what you are judging you'll take the easy pickings.
so i think its the overall format that is broken, you have a whole show that is focused on the actual build, but then 2 judges that can and do only judge on the artistic impact. one of those elements need to change to make the show align, either make it about the build or about the artistic merits of the end piece, but in its current format it doesn't work
To be honest judging on the design and ‘appeal’ of the project is probably a much better approach than trying to judge joinery that has been rushed to an arbitrary timeline.
I’m finding this series have improved year on year
Enter your email address to join: