bp122
Expert at Jibber-Jabber
After spending nearly two years on my dining table-converted-to-workbench, which is the Michael Flatley of workbenches, I have decided to make a proper one. Months of pondering what type and style, weighing up cost, practicality and looks etc., I have decided on a Roubo workbench.
The design will be a split top roubo with a leg vise and no tail vise (at the moment, anyway). Although the tail vise could be very useful, many threads on installing it have made it sound an absolute chore. Also, I like the idea of a Doe’s foot for its simplicity and lower cost and complexity (vise hardware, dovetailing the rear end etc)
This is where my thinking could be categorized as wishful. A small number of them online have been a knockdown version of this. Given the lack of aprons, Roubo bench’s stability is in the massive mortice and tenon joints, further reinforced by glue.
But the knockdown versions say the long stretchers are attached to the leg assemblies using lag bolts and the top is attached to the legs on dry mortice and tenon joints but secured with bolts from underneath through a second cross member (at the top) on the leg assembly.
Before anyone asks, the only reason I am considering a knockdown version is in case we move house in the next few years, I wanted the bench assembly to come apart so that I didn’t have to pay the moving company more than the bench’s worth to move it!
My finger is on the button of a timber supplier’s website……… (just kidding, haven’t gone that insane yet)
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The design will be a split top roubo with a leg vise and no tail vise (at the moment, anyway). Although the tail vise could be very useful, many threads on installing it have made it sound an absolute chore. Also, I like the idea of a Doe’s foot for its simplicity and lower cost and complexity (vise hardware, dovetailing the rear end etc)
This is where my thinking could be categorized as wishful. A small number of them online have been a knockdown version of this. Given the lack of aprons, Roubo bench’s stability is in the massive mortice and tenon joints, further reinforced by glue.
But the knockdown versions say the long stretchers are attached to the leg assemblies using lag bolts and the top is attached to the legs on dry mortice and tenon joints but secured with bolts from underneath through a second cross member (at the top) on the leg assembly.
- Has anyone here tried this?
- Am I right in assuming that a dry joints like this won’t be near as stable as a fully glued up version?
- Any adverse effects of using lag bolts on the long stretchers as opposed to say using a through wedge joint that can be dismantled by taking the wedge off?
Before anyone asks, the only reason I am considering a knockdown version is in case we move house in the next few years, I wanted the bench assembly to come apart so that I didn’t have to pay the moving company more than the bench’s worth to move it!
My finger is on the button of a timber supplier’s website……… (just kidding, haven’t gone that insane yet)
Any help would be greatly appreciated.