President Elect's 'top team'

[Jake]

I provided the evidence, the interview showing exactly what he said

That's just one interview, you need to post them all before proving the negative. In fact you need 24hr film of his whole life. Have you got that Robin, have you?

No I didn't think so.

I win so I'm off to polish my RWM of the Year Cup.

 

[Hypnotic Chimera]

Ooh give it a rest... always harping on about Trump with your obsessive hate posts...have a day off!

Posted anything about Starmer lately? In a thread that has nothing to do with Starmer?
At least this thread is about Trump...
I don't believe you are in any position to ask anyone to give it a rest. In fact, if you had just a teensy weensy bit of self awareness, you'd have to agree.

 

[Hypnotic Chimera]

This is exactly what it looks like. Sums up his whole administration. If he cared about his country and his population, even in losing he would take care of their best interests. This is not.

I've already posted why the claim "Biden did this to mess with Trump" is untrue.

 

[Spectric]

Only history will judge, the republicans look like sore losers and are not happy losing everything but are trying to leave a mess behind for the Democrats, no not old Joes soiled underwear but just causing uneccessary trouble and de stabilising the planet. In any other business if the head got to the state old Joes in they would be replaced before they had any impact on the company, the same as an employee who gets sacked, removed there and then so as not to cause any issues so why is old Joe still in the whitehouse.

 

[TRITON]

Seen the interview with Elon Musks dad ?

Holy jeezus god almighty thats a scary face. You can see why is son is a complete fruitloop

And WTAF is going on with those eyebrows

 

[ey_tony]

Posted anything about Starmer lately? In a thread that has nothing to do with Starmer?
At least this thread is about Trump...
I don't believe you are in any position to ask anyone to give it a rest. In fact, if you had just a teensy weensy bit of self awareness, you'd have to agree.

You just don't get it do you? You're another of the obsessives. When I check my alerts it's three posts from you all having a go simply for daring to have a differing opinion to some of the left wing nonsense and drivel spouted on here by other obsessive ideologues which I'd argue says far more about you and others rather than just me.

As for my criticism of Starmer in this thread. Yes the thread is unsurprisingly anti-Trump but Trump is not my president and never will be, however Starmer unfortunately IS in charge of the UK which does affect ME personally so I have a right to draw comparisons and criticise him and his bunch of buffoons as he's already a proven liar and arguably incompetent but even then I don't obsess about him.

 

[Chris Puttick]

PS In fact it is essential that MPs do not merely vote according to popular majority opinion, when we are bombarded daily from dubious media sources and a whole range of pressure groups, lobbyists, dodgy geezers, with a whole load of BS which is not in our interests.
MPs are supposed to be making well informed and intelligent decisions on our behalf, whether we like it or not. Otherwise what would be the point of them?

Time for an Edmund Burke quote

"...it ought to be the happiness and glory of a representative to live in the strictest union, the closest correspondence, and the most unreserved communication with his constituents. Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their opinion, high respect; theirbusiness, unremitted attention. It is his duty to sacrifice hisrepose, his pleasures, his satisfactions, to theirs; and above all, ever, and in all cases, to prefer their interest to his own. But his unbiassed opinion, his mature judgment, his enlightened conscience, he ought not to sacrifice to you, to any man, or to any set of men living. These he does not derive from your pleasure; no, nor from the law and the constitution. They are a trust from Providence, for the abuse of which he is deeply answerable. Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion."

 

[Blackswanwood]

Only history will judge, the republicans look like sore losers and are not happy losing everything but are trying to leave a mess behind for the Democrats, no not old Joes soiled underwear but just causing uneccessary trouble and de stabilising the planet. In any other business if the head got to the state old Joes in they would be replaced before they had any impact on the company, the same as an employee who gets sacked, removed there and then so as not to cause any issues so why is old Joe still in the whitehouse.

I bet Joe knows which party is which though, The Republicans won.

Ironic that you feel Biden is confused …