Thank you for writing to me to express your concerns about the clause in the Offensive Weapons Bill which makes it an offence to sell bladed products by mail order. I hear your concerns, and I support any reasonable measure to combat violent crime but I believe knee-jerk legislation which may have unintended consequences must be avoided.
In the same way as the clause to prohibit the sale of certain firearms, I believe a number of organisations, including the Countryside Alliance, have raised concerns with the Home Office regarding the complexity of firearms usage, and the possible risks of badly worded legislation for legitimate users.
I am pleased that the Home Office minister has accepted the need to ensure that lawful stalking and pest control were able to continue unaffected as a result of this legislation, which included the need to clearly define the proposals to ensure that there were no unintended consequences of any change in the law. To that end, the Minister gave an assurance that the Home Office would produce clear definitions and guidelines before any new restrictions of large or rapid-fire rifles were introduced. However, I am deeply disappointed that they are yet to do this.
Unfortunately I am unable to speak in the debate on Wednesday on this issue, but I hope the Minister uses this as an opportunity to clarify these issues. My Plaid Cymru colleague, Ben Lake MP, hopes to speak in this debate and is looking to raise this issue with the Minister on my behalf. If no clarity is provided, I will look for opportunities during further stages of this Bill to ensure this is properly scrutinised.