Lumberjack PT330H-1 vs Axminster AP330ST Thicknesser…

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

lski

Member
Joined
16 Jan 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
4
Location
Hereford
Curious if anyone can give me their thoughts on spiral/helical Thicknesser choice..

Am looking between

- Axminster AP330ST (Shinko DH330 / Carbatec TH BX330P on other continents).
- Lumberjack PT330H-1 true Helical thicknesser.

I believe both are brushed motors and 1800kW vs 1500kW


Am curious to know how Lumberjack have seemingly taken a bog standard thicknesser that is probs more or less the same as any Charnwood/Draper/Scheppach/Triton etc and sourced a true helical cutter for it?!

While Jet, Shinko, Axminster etc all now seem to have gone for spiral style cutters as their new products now rather than true helical ones… Presumably this is to hit a price point..


But still, how have Lumberjack managed to come up with a helical one at £100 ish cheaper…

I have obvs seen a good number of posts that say that true helical will probs be a tad better than the Axminster “spiral” cutter..

Interested to know how common sizes of cutter blades for helical spare blades are and if I would be shooting myself in the foot buying Lumberjack.

I also landed on the choice between these 2 as it's also slightly rare to find a 100mm dust outlet as standard. I have a beast of a Axminster Cyclone extractor already and even adapters aren't cheap these days so appreciate a 100mm port being included as standard.
 
I've had my Lumberjack PT330H-1 for a couple of months now and I'm really pleased with it. I believe the cutters are "standard" square carbide cutters.
Does it have a cutter block lock ? I cant find anything about that in the description.
The Ax has one and I'd rather pay 100 quid extra, than not have it.

Curious if anyone can give me their thoughts on spiral/helical Thicknesser choice..

Am looking between

- Axminster AP330ST (Shinko DH330 / Carbatec TH BX330P on other continents).
- Lumberjack PT330H-1 true Helical thicknesser.

I believe both are brushed motors and 1800kW vs 1500kW


Am curious to know how Lumberjack have seemingly taken a bog standard thicknesser that is probs more or less the same as any Charnwood/Draper/Scheppach/Triton etc and sourced a true helical cutter for it?!

While Jet, Shinko, Axminster etc all now seem to have gone for spiral style cutters as their new products now rather than true helical ones… Presumably this is to hit a price point..


But still, how have Lumberjack managed to come up with a helical one at £100 ish cheaper…

I have obvs seen a good number of posts that say that true helical will probs be a tad better than the Axminster “spiral” cutter..

Interested to know how common sizes of cutter blades for helical spare blades are and if I would be shooting myself in the foot buying Lumberjack.

I also landed on the choice between these 2 as it's also slightly rare to find a 100mm dust outlet as standard. I have a beast of a Axminster Cyclone extractor already and even adapters aren't cheap these days so appreciate a 100mm port being included as standard.
With you on the 100mm hose size, especially on a thicknesser as the volume of chippings is really high, too high for 63mm.

I have no doubt the lumberjack is a more than capable machine, but personally I'd prefer the bigger hose and the lock.

-------------------

Related/unrelated to either machine -

Another thing that i dont know the answer of in the case of the Ax is, is the bolts holding in the cutters the same as the lumberjack ? as in the lumberjack are standard hex allen key, and I've been repairing bikes for decades and they always have allen key(until recently*) which chew easily.

A chewed allen key fitting will have to be drilled off, because there is no other way you are going to get it out.
Anyone buys either, check what the bolts are and if they are allen key, then swop them out and get torx* fittings instead
Torx are way better if the bolt is tight or even to some degree seized in. An allen bolt will chew whereas the torx will not, especially if you need to apply a lot of torque to do or undo one.
Even tightening, knowing myself how easy allen key fittings chew, i would be scared to apply too much torque, and fast spinning blades will need a fair amount of torque just to be safe.

Every time you do or undo an allen bolt, the head is worn a little, and even slight wear and the key will slip, usually chewing the rest of it because if only one of the hex edges are damaged, it is f*****d and you wont get it out without a drill as the entire system of allen key design has become compromised
 
Back
Top