Keir Starmer

[RobinBHM]

I’m sure Starmer’s crew could find a way to give NI away

He cant afford to…..NI is the only part of the U.K. doing well…..who would’ve thunk having access to a frictionless market would be beneficial to growth.

“Northern Ireland is expected to be the fastest-growing region alongside London this year, up 1.2% in real GDP. The UK's GDP is predicted to grow by 1.0% in 2024, up from the 0.5% prediction made in PwC's November 2023 Outlook”

 

[RobinBHM]

Widely reported that the Met's plans altered significantly following political intervention.

Widely reported by the media billionaires that own most of the media

 

[Jake]

Yes it makes sense that Taylor Swift bribed Keir Starmer so she could have a security detail, and anyone who thinks this might be true is really thinking through the rage bait.

 

[Chris152]

Yes it makes sense that Taylor Swift bribed Keir Starmer so she could have a security detail

I think that's Swiftgate all cleared up.

I'm now looking for explanations why Alli gifted Starmer a £240 pair of Garrett Leight Hampton 1001s glasses. Anything that'd distract from the real issues the UK govt is trying to address would be nice. Maybe they contain some sort of micro-chip thingy to warp his thinking? Something along those lines would be great.

 

[Scruples]

The did not vote for it. They voted in favour of it but clearly dependent on the terms obtained, when the general common-sense but unspoken assumption was that they would only then vote for or against it, or Parliament just reject it as a lost cause.
Nobody voted for Johnson going head-down brain-off and "just getting brexit done" really badly.

No my point is that we don't rule by plebiscite and the decision should have been left for Parliament to make, following the negotiations.
Only an idi ot would agree to an extremely important and complicated contract with details unknown and undecided. We found our idi ot in Johnson, backed up by tory back bench id iot majority just seeing it as a vote winner. Plus a few `Labour loose cannons!

No, they voted for it AND were in favour of it...
It was Cameron who gave the electorate the referendum thinking that the issue would resolve itself when the result was what the government wanted. Sadly, the outcome didn't go the way he thought it would and shuffled off quickly, only now re-appearing to attempt a come-back.

I tell my children and grandchildren that if you as a question that requires a yes or no reply, be prepared for either. Cameron wasn't.
The people made their feelings known and I have noticed that it's businesses who kicked out the most ever since. Is it that the people voted altruistically and not for business reasons?

 

[spanner48]

.

The virtue of terseness . . .