Paddy Roxburgh":12bueyi4 said:
DW, my comment wasn't aimed at you. it was aimed at someone saying that planing straight/flat with a jointer is only to do with the cap setting and nothing to do with technique, and in the same sentence stating he had never used his jointer. Indeed he was 100% certain. I think that fits the description perfectly. Personally I'm only 80% certain about things I've been doing for thirty years.
Me, too!! (on the 80% certain). It may be less than that. I've learned over the years, three things, though:
1) concluding that you've learned enough that you can stop questioning or debating is a toxic thought. It leads to lack of progress, which leads to disinterest.
2) if you are willing to stick your neck out and be proven wrong, you'll learn a lot more. Sticking your neck out and making an assertion can cause a scuffle.
3) if you argue with someone who is not doing work similar to what you're doing (for example, if machine work and sanding is 95% of what someone does and you're arguing about efficient planing), you're never going to agree with them and they're never going to test what you say, but the next time you post, they might heckle your post.
I get what Ttrees was saying, in his case, that the ability of the cap iron to stay in the cut evenly from start to finish has been more helpful than a long sole (it probably is, as long as you don't go nuts and argue that a stanley 1 with the cap set is an appropriate jointer). I think most won't follow that. Hopefully rudimentary things like keeping a plane square on the cut, adjusting the iron laterally so that the cut is the same thickness from side to side, biasing pressure at the beginning and end of cut, etc....all of those things should sort of be reflex. If they aren't initially, anyone doing an appreciable amount of work will come to them by laziness.