I am assuming this is oak, but I’d appreciate it if someone could confirm, but also how to identify it.
First off, sorry I don’t know what it is but fairly sure it isn’t Oak, just the feel of it really, and the growth rings are too large compared to your thumb in the pic, the face of the board does look a bit like Oak but I bet it would be carroty to work.
Ian
Came across Mango wood for the first time yesterday- coincidence.Mango wood perhaps ?
No Medullary Rays visible,because it has clearly been tangentially-sawn. The wide 'cupping' of the annual rings makes that clear. So you are only seeing them side-on. And the end-grain is the decider. It's oak, as Amplidyne says; fast-grown; but probably not European Oak.It does not look like Oak to me> Where are the medullary rays for a start?
Why do you ask?
if it is dense and heavy it is american white ashView attachment 190689View attachment 190690View attachment 190691I’ve taken apart an old bunk bed that was very heavy and looks to be nicely made. I’m planning to keep the wood and use it when I have a suitable project.
I am assuming this is oak, but I’d appreciate it if someone could confirm, but also how to identify it.
There are 4 ring porous European species - oak, ash, chestnut and elm. It's not elm which has a certain lustre and irregular grain. It's not chestnut which is usually a uniform, mid brown, straight grained timber, pretty boring really. It's not oak, no sign of medullary rays anywhere and colour not rich enough. That leaves ash. The rather sallow appearance in the first pic and the more yellow tint in the 2nd pic are typical ash.No Medullary Rays visible,because it has clearly been tangentially-sawn. The wide 'cupping' of the annual rings makes that clear. So you are only seeing them side-on. And the end-grain is the decider. It's oak, as Amplidyne says; fast-grown; but probably not European Oak.
Enter your email address to join: