Most of this is done now, could do a bit more scraping but was happy enough to test out.
Done some inspecting of the Morse tapers, sledgehammer head "hardy hole" was great to use for getting out the chuck, as it was very stuck.
Blued everything with permanent marker expecting to possibly see something apparent, not so,
just trial and error using the long drill getting it the best I could,
and two wee file marks to align it again.
(shoulda wiped off the marker ink,I was to find out)
That done and everything properly affixed, I was getting some inconsistency, tracked down to the
(knee?) so drill and tapped for a pair of bolts for a hopefully permanent 90 degrees.
Will try editing this to explain, kinda messed up my experiment as I didn't have the table
low enough and clanged into the vice jaws.
Shoulda had it a few mm lower, doh!
And to add insult to injury
I proceeded to do what should win ultimate numpty move of the week,
and test out the jig
after moving the scissor jack!
(Ideally one would want a tight fitting hole for indexing the bit from, and not a tapered bore from a printer roller, so some luck required/not a guarantee)
Seeing as the adjustment of the jack alters, I should have set the table height to suit the large bit first, which I forgot lol
This is where the plate can come into play, although need to do a bit more work on that yet, more eager to get on with the job.
i.e if I had the jack lower down I could have been using the plate to reach for the bottom of the jack.
If you're managing to understand my rambelings, you might question the indexing plates
use in this way, and the knee?/undertable support is omited!
I did use a wee shim of timber, but not sure if it was a good idea or not.
Certainly for my scissor jack, is too skewed to use for support, since pressing down would shift the index, so this is interesting to find out more about that.
Might keep an eye out for a bottle jack as I'm guessing this wouldn't be an issue?
I don't mind using a shim.
Some pictures
Loose old belts made this take a bit.
As said either a numpty move on my part, or the bit not a great fit, and edges well chowdered up from testing also.
Seems to have copied the above which one can't fault the jig for.
Needed a bit of filing to be a tight press fit needing knocking off with a mallet,
Very pleased I could get the error out, just about!
This is definitely a good enough fit to get the measurments I'm after.
Can face one side on the lathe now, bore is enough centered to turn faces on the mandrel.
(original face on one side bang on, so it is less guesswork)
and test the depth of the part more accurately than before, for documentation purposes.
remove again and bevel the part.
This might explain, too much variance in first attempt underneath.
Tom