The Nova lathes do not have provisions for outboard turning, the headstock swivels. The shaft is more or less flush on the outboard end of the headstock and has an internal thread for a small hand wheel (if mounted) that also serves as a connection for vacuum chucking. I can stick my index finger in just past the finger nail. My highly precise measuring tool for holes.
Pete
That isn't so.
The NOVA range of lathes (NOVA Galaxi, XP, 1624 and 1624), can all use the NOVA outrigger.
The headstock swivels around, so will face outwards - you don't attach a chuck on the rear of the headstock spindle.
This was for the original grey coloured lathes - you'll see the headstock and outrigger positioned to turn a large platter:
https://www.teknatool.com/products/lathe-accessories/nova-outrigger-lathe-accessory-grey/
This is for the later black coloured lathes:
https://www.teknatool.com/products/lathe-accessories/nova-outrigger-lathe-accessory-black/
This link is to the outrigger manual:
https://www.teknatool.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/NOVA-Outrigger-Manual_Sept-26-2011.pdf
Our woodturning Club had a Nova DVRXP3000 bought new in 2008 which came with an outrigger.
When we bought it, we were concerned about the longevity and reliability of the rather complex motor and control gear being located in the headstock rather than a separate motor. Those fears were realised when the control board failed after ten years, rendering the lathe beyond economic repair. It had only been used 2 hours per month - 120 hours a year and only by professional demonstrators. The outrigger was never used as a 2-hour demonstration time doesn't give any scope, and the lathe itself will turn up to 16" diameter).
I had a Nova '1624' (16" diameter turning capacity, 24" between centres), which has the same legs, lathe bed and tailstock as the DVRXP, but an outboard 1.5HP motor and 8-speed pulley. That too could use an outrigger, but I neither wanted nor needed one.
As to spindle threads, the 1 1/4" x 8 thread was largely for the American Market, but when Nova were first marketed in the UK, they were also that thread. However, the standard throughout Europe became M33, and my '1624' was M33. I already had two Nova chucks which had 1 1/4" x 8 for my earlier lathe, with inserts for a 3/4" spindle of my previous lathe. I only discovered when I removed the inserts that the chuck wouldn't fit my 1624 lathe. You can't by an insert to convert a 1 1/4" chuck to fit 33 x 8 - it has to be an 'exert'. (This reduces the distance between centres of the lathe).
An M33 chuck will fit onto a 1 1/4" x 8 spindle (albeit slightly sloppy), but a 1 1/4" x 8 chuck won't fit an M33 spindle.
I've attached a pic of the 'exert' on my 1 1/4" x 8 Nova chuck to adapt it to the M33 spindle of my Nova 1644 lathe.
I've since sold that lathe as when turning things such a pens, which call for maybe three different speeds for turning, sanding and polishing, though belt-changing only took a couple of minutes, I found it a bit irksome so I bought a smaller lathe with variable speed control and 6" over the bed. (I only bought the 1624 initially because I followed the usual mantra 'you can turn small things on a large lathe but you can't turn large things on a small lathe. But realistically, was I ever going to want to turn 16" bowls or platters? No, and I never did.
Hope that's on interest.
David.