Jacob
What goes around comes around.
It's OK don't worry about me I'm used to violent opposition!iNewbie":19s1umjz said:You know what Einstein once said, Mike: Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds
It's OK don't worry about me I'm used to violent opposition!iNewbie":19s1umjz said:You know what Einstein once said, Mike: Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds
it's pretty obvious really. Having designed the stuff and printed the directory you aren't going to sit around staring at a piece of wood waiting for orders! There'd be some finished stock of best sellers and for display, and a great deal of material in various stages of preparation, perhaps ready to be adapted to different design options.cowfoot":fueuq1ln said:This thread has taken a few interesting twists and turns!
For what it's worth, Kirkham's "London Furniture Trade 1700-1870" points out that individual makers were on the absolute bottom rung of production, making items from substandard materials and having to hawk them around for a very low price. Georgian furniture of high quality, it seems, was a collaborative effort involving at least some degree of specialisation.
CStanford":2hgo0clj said:Alan Peters, in Cabinetmaking, the Professional Approach, refers in several passages to certain items being 'best sellers' and other words to that effect. Once you've put people on the payroll they need to be doing something and that something usually means building for least a little bit of salable inventory. Perhaps they didn't build until they had an actual order in hand, but it's clear he sold the same or essentially the same designs repeatedly, though clearly along with special one-off orders too.
Couldn't be wronger. Innovation came from the 'country' and ended up in London (maybe). Chippendale, Hepplewhite, Sheraton were all form oop north.Cheshirechappie":1xn40esp said:..... Country furniture tended to carry on using techniques long after they were superceded in fashionable London work. ....
Ship building drove timber technology and developed woodworking skills. The skills would have filtered back into building architecture and furniture making. You can still see the influence in shop fronts and buildings in coastal towns with a ship building tradition.Cheshirechappie":3csfvh80 said:Most 'cabinetmaking' techniques (as opposed to 'joinery') were developed in continental Europe, and brought to England by continental craftsmen. They went were the fashionable market was - London - and the techniques they brought (veneering, inlay, marquetry, Boulle work, French polishing etc) filtered out to the provinces over many decades.
I know you like to provoke an argument by posting any old bull, but even by your standards the claim that shipbuilding drove furniture design is pretty laughable.
Jacob":2dhy49qs said:Couldn't be wronger. Innovation came from the 'country' and ended up in London (maybe). Chippendale, Hepplewhite, Sheraton were all form oop north.Cheshirechappie":2dhy49qs said:..... Country furniture tended to carry on using techniques long after they were superceded in fashionable London work. ....
The main driving force for innovation would be ship building - a massive industry with many spin offs.
Good question. Vernacular furniture is by definition 'local'. Not sure if there is a London vernacular - they generally borrowed everything from the regions. If you want to know about it have a look at https://regionalfurnituresociety.org/woodbrains":3h7h9z5r said:Jacob":3h7h9z5r said:Couldn't be wronger. Innovation came from the 'country' and ended up in London (maybe). Chippendale, Hepplewhite, Sheraton were all form oop north.Cheshirechappie":3h7h9z5r said:..... Country furniture tended to carry on using techniques long after they were superceded in fashionable London work. ....
The main driving force for innovation would be ship building - a massive industry with many spin offs.
Hello,
There is a paradox here, that cannot be explained, except by the fact your statement is beyond stupid. If innovation came from the country, what exactly is 'country vernacular furniture?'
Mike.
If it was rhetorical you'd have to explain what you meant by your term 'country vernacular' as it doesn't quite mean anything to me.woodbrains":1nouvteu said:Hello,
Wow, Jacob do you even know what a rhetorical question is?
Mike.
Jacob":1hej8v5v said:Couldn't be wronger. Innovation came from the 'country' and ended up in London (maybe). Chippendale, Hepplewhite, Sheraton were all form oop north.Cheshirechappie":1hej8v5v said:..... Country furniture tended to carry on using techniques long after they were superceded in fashionable London work. ....
The main driving force for innovation would be ship building - a massive industry with many spin offs.
That's a bit obscure. If the transmission would be impossible how would it find it's way out of the cities to influence the country bumpkins?cowfoot":3c33yt43 said:Jacob":3c33yt43 said:Couldn't be wronger. Innovation came from the 'country' and ended up in London (maybe). Chippendale, Hepplewhite, Sheraton were all form oop north.Cheshirechappie":3c33yt43 said:..... Country furniture tended to carry on using techniques long after they were superceded in fashionable London work. ....
The main driving force for innovation would be ship building - a massive industry with many spin offs.
Even if you accept that innovation came from the country (a proposition that contradicts pretty much all economic and social history), the transmission and adoption of that innovation would have been impossible outside of urban areas. Cities are the seedbed of technology, ever since Ur.
You should read some Adam Smith, or perhaps Pepys if you're interested in how a Londoner can influence shipbuilding!
Enter your email address to join: