Beau":17272qt0 said:
Harbo":17272qt0 said:
That's a very harsh decision based on so few responses - non of my Tuffsaws blades have ever broken.
And those that broke could be down to faulty set up?
Rod
Don't think it's harsh.
Why change from a supplier who's blades have never broken for me to one that I can see several reports of blades breaking.
Hey, it's entirely your call.
I'd only point out that the blade "tension indicator" on my saw is an odd shaped, thin and bendy metal washer on the tensioning bolt, with a blob of red paint on it. It's rubbish, but that's how it was designed. At best it gives a guide to blade length rather than tension.
I have found that Tuffsaws's blades need less tension than some of the others,
probably because Ian's welds are straighter and smoother, and the tooth profiles seem to cut better. I can't tell you by how much or how little,
because I can't measure tension on my saw,
I have no idea what tension I'm actually using, only that I tension until I get a certain "twang" and deflection on the far side of the loop, and until I get good results for the job in hand.
There's a general view (I think!) that Ian's blades cut nicely, perhaps more so than other people's. It's almost impossible to say objectively, whether or not they're as tough, less or more so (at the welds or anywhere), as nobody posting has any
objective way of measuring this.
We all make choices based on imperfect information, but what we haven't had in this thread is any proof of any sort that, when correctly used, Tuffsaws's blades are any more likely to break than anyone else's.
And to be clear here, although I like the Tuffsaws blades I have, I'm not supporting Ian in this post, nor condemning the original poster. I'm only suggesting not jumping to
any conclusions at all, because there are far too many variables and no sound evidence at all to go on.
Try something. If you like it stick with it.