Phil Pascoe
Established Member
There's bound to be poverty when poverty is decided by an arbitrary line, with people above and below it. Try telling people in Yemen, Syria etc. that we have 14,000,000 people living in poverty.
RogerS":cq79ue6a said:Selwyn":cq79ue6a said:Food producer mate.
...
Ah, I see. You're the person who counts each baked bean into the tin. That would explain a lot.
RogerS":1qfml2y4 said:Selwyn":1qfml2y4 said:And a bowl of porridge and honey costs what? 7p?...
Ah, you said you were in the food industry. Meals on Wheels perhaps.
OK...I know that I said I'd not respond to you gain but seriously...I doubt you're in any sort of meaningful capacity in the food industry. Dish washer, perhaps ?
Andy Kev.":2do237bb said:I suppose everybody would have a different approach to dealing with this but I think that mine would be - assuming that I genuinely valued the friendship and normally had high regard for this chap - would be to do nothing until running into him again once all the corona fuss has died down. Then over a pint get him to see that panic had led him to being a selfish fool. If he's not man enough to accept the latter point, then IMO he's not worthy to be a friend. We all make mistakes and we all occasionally do things that are wrong. We are usually better for coughing (no pun intended) to them and if he does manage that then the friendship will be resurrected.Lons":2do237bb said:What the others said, it's sad but when everything has blown over things often have a habit of recovering.
Seems a shame to lose a 30 year friendship but in your case I would have had little hesitation in telling him he's wrong.
But like I say, that's just me.
Selwyn":1fndv6jn said:RogerS":1fndv6jn said:Selwyn":1fndv6jn said:At the end of the day no one in this country has starved. People couldn't just get everything they want for about 8 days.
That a remarkably glib reply.
Not really.
Look the panic buying was real for sure. Everyone thinks they didn't do any of it but actually pretty much everyone did. I'm not talking about trolleys full of toilet roll but everyone bought a little bit more of this and that and created a panic.
There was and is no shortage of food in this country. Whilst some headline photos of the pensioner in the supermarket hunched over the aisles, or the NHS nurse crying were undoubtedly real they were also extremely temporary. Facts are that there are always alternatives. Smaller shops said they had plenty of supply. Many catering sectors did too.
The feeding frenzy developed a further frenzy and then collective outrage because everybody still expected to get what they wanted when they wanted which is clearly not going to happen immediatley.
Richard_C":2zgre9pg said:I don't condone hoarding, especially if what is hoarded will be discarded or if it for later re-sale at a profit. But I bet we are all buying a few more days ahead than we normally do - I certainly am because 2 or 3 mini-shopping trips a week is more of a risk than 1. And please don't judge me because I've got 24 eggs and 3 packs of butter in my trolley - I have 2 neighbours who can't get out. Other people you see in shops might be buying for others, have a large family, or just be unable to get to the shops regularly.
While I don't condone hoarding I can understand it. We all behave rationally, but we have all had different experiences and 'rational' differs from person to person. My father saw great deprivation in Italy (Bomber pilot, 81 ops) and the UK during and post war. His father was killed in 1917 so he said they never had enough food at home when he was young. When I was growing up in the 50's and 60's he always kept a few tins in the cupboard - beans and spam I think - and a productive garden. I never asked, but his 'rational' was probably that he never wanted his family to go hungry. I worked in HR on Merseyside in the 80s, some of the union reps told me about their experience when young, fathers doing casual work on the docks and bakeries and in lean weeks they went hungry. That's why they didn't trust, or even hated, the bosses. There are lots of stories like that - then and now. I am a school governor and we have children coming to school hungry, in 2020 in what is a rich nation. What will their behaviour be if one day they can afford to hoard a little?
We have had inconveniences, sugar shortage of '74 is an example and it wasn't a real shortage even then. Many of us, including me, have never lived through proper unrelenting hardship. I would be distraught if my children when young had said "Dad I'm hungry", really meaning it not just whingeing, and I could do nothing about it.
Maybe your friend was regularly sent to bed without food as a punishment as a child, maybe long ago his family went hungry for some reason, maybe he feels a strong need to be the provider (we no longer leave our caves and return 3 days later with a dead elk on our shoulder, we come home from Tesco with a boot full of goodies). Maybe he sees himself as a rescuer - when the chips are down he has the resources to provide for relatives. You will never know and can never ask, you may not approve but maybe you can understand that what he thinks is 'rational' may not be greed but something else altogether.
What if he had never told you, never proudly shown you his stockroom? Maybe you have other friends who have stores of this and that but haven't told you, would you be just as angry with them if you found out? Was telling you the mistake? I'm not supporting hoarding for the sake of it, but we should all try to understand why we act differently from one another.
We might all lose friends - or they us - to the virus, making peace might be the best thing we can do right now. When you are on a ventilator you can't speak. I'm not saying that to be gloomy, just realistic. Maybe we should all hoard as much goodwill as we can, just in case. I wasn't a part of the conversation you had with him, so mustn't judge and may have done exactly what you did, but maybe you can build a bridge back one day soon.
Selwyn":1f4pww0q said:Look the panic buying was real for sure. Everyone thinks they didn't do any of it but actually pretty much everyone did. I'm not talking about trolleys full of toilet roll but everyone bought a little bit more of this and that and created a panic.
There was and is no shortage of food in this country. Whilst some headline photos of the pensioner in the supermarket hunched over the aisles, or the NHS nurse crying were undoubtedly real they were also extremely temporary. Facts are that there are always alternatives. Smaller shops said they had plenty of supply. Many catering sectors did too.
The feeding frenzy developed a further frenzy and then collective outrage because everybody still expected to get what they wanted when they wanted which is clearly not going to happen immediatley.
welly":jawq6iul said:Given that in 2017/2018 it was estimated that 14 million people in this country were living in poverty (it's been since redefined what is poverty so that number may well have fallen), there's a lot of people who don't have that financial, physical or mental capacity to take responsibility for food budgeting.
So, there are *plenty* of people starving in this country.
Andy Kev.":374d9uw7 said:....
I do not see how you can say that there are plenty of people starving in the UK. Do you have any evidence for that? And indeed, what do you mean by "starving"?
Phil Pascoe":1i8xsxi2 said:As long as the bottom n% of the population is classed as living in poverty it should come as no surprise that we can't abolish it.
RogerS":2yhflcd1 said:Andy Kev.":2yhflcd1 said:....
I do not see how you can say that there are plenty of people starving in the UK. Do you have any evidence for that? And indeed, what do you mean by "starving"?
I could find no evidence. Plenty to suggest malnutrition is prevalent especially in poorer areas.
Rorschach":3h8yqb1w said:I'd be very interested to know what the definition is of poverty and starving in the UK.
I live in/near to a poor area, there are people here who are 2-3 generation unemployed/benefit reliant. I am not seeing anyone starving or in what I would consider poverty. Indeed many look "well fed" shall we say and all have good clothes, technology etc. They seem to have very different priorities than myself though and other people I know.
One of my brothers lives in one of those "poor" areas although he certainly wouldn't class his family as being in that category, they are well fed and for a good reason which is very simple i.e. they buy decent honest food and cook proper meals from scratch, they didn't feed their kids on easy junk stick in the microwave cr*p, crisps, and burgers like most of his neighbours whocan't be bothered and don't give a monkeys.RogerS":3lw0l5cn said:Andy Kev.":3lw0l5cn said:....
I do not see how you can say that there are plenty of people starving in the UK. Do you have any evidence for that? And indeed, what do you mean by "starving"?
I could find no evidence. Plenty to suggest malnutrition is prevalent especially in poorer areas.
Yep, all abundantly obvious in the area I'm talking about, hell of a lot of sat dishes, decent cars and a high percentage of smokers! *** money could buy a lot of healthy food and no good saying they can't give up as the help is available to them foc if they wanted it.Of those 14 million, how many have a mobile phone/car/flat screen telly/clothes which they were able to buy new etc.? Such people are not poor.
Woody2Shoes":30gd3cog said:RogerS":30gd3cog said:Andy Kev.":30gd3cog said:....
I do not see how you can say that there are plenty of people starving in the UK. Do you have any evidence for that? And indeed, what do you mean by "starving"?
I could find no evidence. Plenty to suggest malnutrition is prevalent especially in poorer areas.
I judge the demographics of an area by the amount of obesity I see amongst the local population. Poverty is not (just) about money.
Enter your email address to join: