Swap the blade, altough sharpening a a few more times may still sort it out (during heat treatment the outer most part of the metal will be softer, but this softer metal should have been removed after a few sharpening sessions)
adrian":3p46r3bf said:There was a glint visible on the back of the blade along the center of the edge indicating some sort of edge failure, I assume. (And this glint was pretty hard to remove at the stones.)
adrian":3u4a32an said:There was a glint visible on the back of the blade along the center of the edge indicating some sort of edge failure, I assume. (And this glint was pretty hard to remove at the stones.)
Paul Chapman":3c0snlr7 said:When a blade gets blunt, the previously sharp edge becomes rounded, so when honing it is necessary to remove this roundness, which will be on both sides of the blade. The more blunt the blade (ie the more you carry on using the blunt blade and delay honing) the more pronounced this roundness will become and the more honing you will need to do to remove it.
What I now tend to do when honing my blades is to hone them with a 30 degree bevel, using a Veritas honing guide, then use the feature which enables you to alter the roller to give a 1 or 2 degree micro bevel. I find this the fastest way to remove the roundness and achieve a perfectly sharp edge. Another way of doing it is to use the David Charlesworth 'ruler trick', although I don't favour that. Alternatively, you can just carry on honing at a single angle, but that will take longer.
The glint you are seeing on your blades is, I suspect, bluntness caused by not ensuring that the roundness is completely removed - a blunt blade will always show a glint whereas a sharp one won't.
PS Another way to see where the wear is taking place on the blade is to keep the end of the cap iron (chip breaker) polished. When you've been planing for a while and remove the blade and cap iron, you will see that resin and general gunge from the wood has collected on the cap iron.
adrian":36yvdro1 said:I use a secondary bevel. However, it tends to grow bigger and bigger and then the advantage is not so big until I grind back the primary bevel.
adrian":1usf9ckh said:The Veritas guide actually damaged the edge when I reinserted the blade for the final polish. (The damage is where the cambered blade pressed up against the stop that determines the extension. It may be necessary to avoid using the stop and just estimate the projection for the final step. Or to do like Charlesworth and switch guides, I suppose.)
What I do is hone the blade at 30 degrees on my coarse and fine diamond stones and this quickly removes the old, very small, micro bevel, then put on a new micro bevel each time. I then finish on a leather strop with jewellers rouge.
If you keep on honing the secondary bevel so that it gets bigger each time, your honing is going to take longer and it will take a lot of honing to get rid of the rounded over edge.
Paul Chapman":24iegk47 said:adrian":24iegk47 said:I use a secondary bevel. However, it tends to grow bigger and bigger and then the advantage is not so big until I grind back the primary bevel.
What I do is hone the blade at 30 degrees on my coarse and fine diamond stones and this quickly removes the old, very small, micro bevel, then put on a new micro bevel each time. I then finish on a leather strop with jewellers rouge.
If you keep on honing the secondary bevel so that it gets bigger each time, your honing is going to take longer and it will take a lot of honing to get rid of the rounded over edge. If you do it my way, it's very quick and you don't have to bother with grinding.
Jake":2aufz0ok said:This saga gets more and more strange. Are you sure you haven't put a slice of cheese in the plane by mistake? :lol:
Got any pictures to share, or did I miss them?
adrian":i74iyoq9 said:Er, maybe I'm misunderstanding
but this means you're grinding the primary bevel every time you sharpen
Paul Chapman":1ivxjrl6 said:Possibly. You also seem reluctant to try anything anyone suggests. Maybe the best thing would be to find someone who lives near you and who knows how to sharpen blades, to show you how to do it.
Paul
woodbloke":2jxjr0kc said:Adrian wrote:but this means you're grinding the primary bevel every time you sharpen
No...the primary bevel (in my case 23deg, the big wide one) is re-ground only when the secondary bevel (the one at 30deg) has been honed so much that it becomes difficult to establish an edge (and ultimately remove the micro-bevel).
The grinding process shortens the effective length of the steel (which is why old, well used blades are always short)
ivan":2hvzjj22 said:You mention trouble with the lateral position - is this shifting in use?
However, I have not done any adjustments to the frog or lever cap. I worked the chip breaker to get a good fit, but that's about it, I think.One of my Clifton frogs required a bit of flattening as did the blade face that meets the frog. When rectified the lateral adjustment was much stiffer with a similar lever cap setting, and it stopped drifting in use. Flat the 'working' underside of the lever cap. Don't assume anything is actually flat! A cheap Chinese granite surface plate has definite rigidity, I think Harbor freight do one, was in FW?. Mine is big enough for a #8.
If the blade has a lot of camber with a fine cut set, on flat work, the plane will cut initially in the blade centre, and then will stop cutting when the edges of the sole touch the work. (unless you then increase the cut).
You should still be able to get a full width shaving with a cambered blade, so the camber must be a shaving thickness or less. If you plane watching the mouth, till you get a continuous shaving (on an edge), the shaving should be in the centre of the mouth or the lateral lever needs adjsuting.
This would require a straight blade, right? (No camber.)For longer boards, if you plane 2 together, you can invert one on the other and test the joint in the straightedge way - pivot from both ends - then joint is hollow, eye shows how much.
Whilst testing out your planing and the plane itself, by practicing, you could revert to a straight edge which removes one variable, and then introduce it later. As you can see, camber can give rise to odd effects if you keep planing over exactly the same ground.I was taught to correct an edge to 90 deg (with a straight ground blade, camber was only for rough stuff) by tweaking the lateral lever to correct, but find the cambered blade method easier.
tnimble":2mlo9ivj said:The stop is of soft aluminium the blade is high carbon tool steel ground around 30 degrees. It should not be able to damage the edge inless slammed / pressed pretty hard into the stop. With HCTS ground at this angle it's even possible to plane some length of aluminium (yes I have done that, last week I planes a dado in some poly carbonate with my LN shoulder plane)
adrian":soqnczbn said:tnimble":soqnczbn said:The stop is of soft aluminium the blade is high carbon tool steel ground around 30 degrees. It should not be able to damage the edge inless slammed / pressed pretty hard into the stop. With HCTS ground at this angle it's even possible to plane some length of aluminium (yes I have done that, last week I planes a dado in some poly carbonate with my LN shoulder plane)
Because the blade is cambered it meets the stop at a single point, so all the forces and stresses that I might apply as I try to get it properly positioned will be focused on one single point of the edge. Even so, you think the aluminum is too soft to damage the blade? (If so, I'll have to investigate further the source of the damage.)
Enter your email address to join: