Hudson Carpentry
Established Member
Do these improve suction and work just as good or better as a normal chip extractor over say 10m of steel pipe?
I have a 150mm extractor that splits into two 100mm so would mess my setup up and would need "rejigging" again (which im fed up of doing) if I had the 150mm. One of the 100mm pipes solely feeds the thicknesser planer and mortiser. Im thinking if I use the 100mm cyclone on the other 100mm steel would benefit me as that has the bandsaw, table saw, lathe and soon to be router table and disc / spindle sander.
Now then does it make any difference if I was to place this cyclone more "inline" say 3-5m of steel which then feeds the other 10m or so. Reason being is space and I think I would like to put this above the beams where all the steel pipes run. Yes changing this would be a pain but as its the T/P that fills the extractor up quickly which wouldn't be on the cyclone side its mainly going to be dust in the drop box, so it wouldn't need changing that often.
I have a 150mm extractor that splits into two 100mm so would mess my setup up and would need "rejigging" again (which im fed up of doing) if I had the 150mm. One of the 100mm pipes solely feeds the thicknesser planer and mortiser. Im thinking if I use the 100mm cyclone on the other 100mm steel would benefit me as that has the bandsaw, table saw, lathe and soon to be router table and disc / spindle sander.
Now then does it make any difference if I was to place this cyclone more "inline" say 3-5m of steel which then feeds the other 10m or so. Reason being is space and I think I would like to put this above the beams where all the steel pipes run. Yes changing this would be a pain but as its the T/P that fills the extractor up quickly which wouldn't be on the cyclone side its mainly going to be dust in the drop box, so it wouldn't need changing that often.