Saved by the guy wiv the funny monniker...... again! :wink:Sgian Dubh":1brbegwl said:I guess I ought to admit that it wuz me wot rit 'em, just so you can tell my opinion of the author is completely unbiased, ha, ha-- ha, ha, ha. Slainte.
Saved by the guy wiv the funny monniker...... again!
I cannot recommend highly enough two issues of Furniture & Cabinetmaking, issues 85 and 86, February and March 2004.
Mr_Grimsdale":9x8sir8m said:Anyway, what you should NEVER EVER do is what someone said earlier in this thread - i.e. to take marks from one piece of wood applied to another. If you do this it's like chinese whispers and every time you do it you could be magnifying the error.
Perzakerley! :lol: Tapes are a major source of errors (one of my hobby horses)Mr_Grimsdale":xhi1vviy said:At this point you can (in theory) throw away your tape measure as everything has been decided. You are now on auto-pilot. You just drop your planed up bits of timber (in opposite pairs where they are paired) onto the rod and take off the measurements with a set square, then mark all round each piece, and you're laughing - you can't go wrong (in theory).
I'd cut down on the Worcester Sauce if I were you - it's obviously making you feisty.Mr_Grimsdale":xhi1vviy said:I've just had 2 G&Ts and a shot of Lea and Perrins.
Ah yes, but how will you ever convince those without the formal training? I admit that when I was taught how to make one many years ago I couldn't see the point. These days 80% of my pieces use them - they increase repeatability and consistency and I reckon that they speed the job up as well.Mr_Grimsdale":xhi1vviy said:I'd like to see that. Rods are a particular enthusiasm with me - as possibly the single most important thing every woodworker should understand.