Jacob
What goes around comes around.
He did painted pine too. You can see this in the new V&A furniture gallery:
arnoldmason8":h9ni42pp said:I've just watched this and I agree with Andy re camera work but it was a lot better most of this type of programme and we did see some craftsmen actually doing things. The veneer being used for the marquertry was thin modern stuff - the original would have been thick hand sawn veneer which you could not cut with a knife. Overall I enjoyed the programme and I am looking forward to the rest of the series.
Cheers------Arnold
bugbear":2jj0m7az said:I have a dim memory of the original veneers being VERY strongly coloured (as revealed by a small section of a piece which was protected from light), and a modern craftsman being commissioned to reproduce a panel in "full colour".
I don't think they fade 'to the right colour' - they just fade. Too much sunlight and they darken or fade faster.phil.p":3ak5q7pb said:As regards the colouring of the inlays - I remember seeing the workshop of a guy making repro Chippendale about 40yrs ago, and commenting on the extremely vivid inlays. He pointed out that they needed to be that bright to fade to the right colour, as they used pigments and dyes made up to be as original as possible. He showed me a piece that they were copying, with the new piece next to it - you'd never have believed they would ever look the same.
Jacob":hvrj9wy3 said:I don't think they fade 'to the right colour' - they just fade. Too much sunlight and they darken or fade faster.phil.p":hvrj9wy3 said:As regards the colouring of the inlays - I remember seeing the workshop of a guy making repro Chippendale about 40yrs ago, and commenting on the extremely vivid inlays. He pointed out that they needed to be that bright to fade to the right colour, as they used pigments and dyes made up to be as original as possible. He showed me a piece that they were copying, with the new piece next to it - you'd never have believed they would ever look the same.
I used to have a corner cupboard with a marquetry 'Britannia' and the red white and blue flag had all gone shades of brown. Everything brown in fact except the sea which was deep green, probably not the original colour.
They had no more control over colour than artists of the period, whose paintings would also fade or darken, quite unintentionally, depending on how/where they were kept.
But then it will look like new Chippendale when it's new! If you want it to look like old Chippendale when it's new, then you would match the faded (or darkened) colours.bugbear":9scucsp8 said:Jacob":9scucsp8 said:I don't think they fade 'to the right colour' - they just fade. Too much sunlight and they darken or fade faster.phil.p":9scucsp8 said:As regards the colouring of the inlays - I remember seeing the workshop of a guy making repro Chippendale about 40yrs ago, and commenting on the extremely vivid inlays. He pointed out that they needed to be that bright to fade to the right colour, as they used pigments and dyes made up to be as original as possible. He showed me a piece that they were copying, with the new piece next to it - you'd never have believed they would ever look the same.
I used to have a corner cupboard with a marquetry 'Britannia' and the red white and blue flag had all gone shades of brown. Everything brown in fact except the sea which was deep green, probably not the original colour.
They had no more control over colour than artists of the period, whose paintings would also fade or darken, quite unintentionally, depending on how/where they were kept.
If you're making a piece that you intend to look like an old Chippendale when the piece you make is itself old, you have to make it with very bright colours when it's new. Thus the piece you make does indeed "fade to the right colour".
BugBear
That's what is known as a 'tautology'jimi43":37fdnxmf said:The reason some colours fade to nothing and others stay is a function of the permanency of the pigments used.
And wood, oils and varnishes tend to darken.Blues and some yellows can be quite fugitive whereas the natural colours made from earth pigments tend to be more permanent.
Jim
Fromey":1siudlz3 said:I greatly enjoyed it but also wondered why they didn't explain how he got the initial capital to make the Director and to address the issue of his actual workmanship as opposed to his design and management (which was implied only).
I really liked the little bit on Anthony Hay's workshop in Colonial Williamsburg. If you're not familiar with it, here is their somewhat infrequent blog;
http://anthonyhaycabinetmaker.wordpress.com/
I use the following picture from that workshop as my desktop background on all my computers so it was a treat to see the carver working right next to it;
http://anthonyhaycabinetmaker.files.wor ... c_0008.jpg
If you want to view regionally restricted videos, you should Google "ip spoofing to view videos" and start reading.
Jacob":2iteyykq said:But then it will look like new Chippendale when it's new!bugbear":2iteyykq said:Jacob":2iteyykq said:I don't think they fade 'to the right colour' - they just fade.
...
They had no more control over colour than artists of the period, whose paintings would also fade or darken, quite unintentionally, depending on how/where they were kept.
If you're making a piece that you intend to look like an old Chippendale when the piece you make is itself old, you have to make it with very bright colours when it's new. Thus the piece you make does indeed "fade to the right colour".
BugBear
AndyT":2soceyxq said:Was the family trade carpentry or joinery? (They are not the same thing!)
1911 said:He[The Carpenter] is distinguished from the joiner by his operations being directed to the mere carcass of a building, to things which have reference to structure only. Almost everything the carpenter does to a building is absolutely necessary to its stability and efficiency, whereas the joiner does not begin his operations until the carcass is complete, and every article of joiners' work might at any time be removed from a building without undermining it or affecting its most important qualities. Certainly in the practice of building a few things do occur regarding which it is difficult to determine to whose immediate province they belong, but the distinction is sufficiently broad for general purposes.
Enter your email address to join: