Dibs-h
Established Member
Mark
Obviously we aren't discussing aerofoil design here, as you don't want your building lifting off.
Framing issues - over your openings you are missing the doubled up headers. The wall plate where your rafters sit are undersized. Are the nailing patterns for the studs, noggins, etc. as per TRADA's recommendations? Have you cut birdmouth's in the ends of your rafters? What is the depth of the vertical cut of the birdsmouth as a ratio of the rafter depth? Have you skew nailed them from both sides?
"Using a ratchet strap to close up the gap where the rafters meet the ridge board" - it appears the length of the rafters is marginally short. How well do you think the fixings will cope with the tension that will be created once you release the straps and over time under the tension?
How do you propose to contain the outward thrust at the base of the rafters? What's the depth and thickness of your ridge board?
Having created 3 openings in one wall - a set of french doors (IIRC from one of your earlier posts) what negative affect does that create in terms of wind loading? How do you propose to deal with that? In my own build putting 3 openings in a masonry wall caused the structure to fail wind load calculations with a traditional purlin and rafter roof, until the design was modified to include 2 large King Post trusses and their large tie beams. That's in a sheltered location compared to yours. So how is your current design going to fair - worse, comparatively speaking.
Is you nailing pattern for the OSB as per TRADA's recommendations, in terms of nailing pattern\density and nail spec?
What are your primary requirements from a roof? Ease of build? Headroom? Cost? Aesthetics? As these will dictate the options you have to choose from.
As for taking your comments the wrong way - don't worry about that, after all it's your shed. My comments earlier regarding pausing for thoughts still stand. I appreciate you might not see it, but to me this build, i.e. planning on the hoof, isn't the best way forward. You may pull it off or you may not. You may disagree - in which case we can agree to disagree.
Regards
Dibs
Obviously we aren't discussing aerofoil design here, as you don't want your building lifting off.
Framing issues - over your openings you are missing the doubled up headers. The wall plate where your rafters sit are undersized. Are the nailing patterns for the studs, noggins, etc. as per TRADA's recommendations? Have you cut birdmouth's in the ends of your rafters? What is the depth of the vertical cut of the birdsmouth as a ratio of the rafter depth? Have you skew nailed them from both sides?
"Using a ratchet strap to close up the gap where the rafters meet the ridge board" - it appears the length of the rafters is marginally short. How well do you think the fixings will cope with the tension that will be created once you release the straps and over time under the tension?
How do you propose to contain the outward thrust at the base of the rafters? What's the depth and thickness of your ridge board?
Having created 3 openings in one wall - a set of french doors (IIRC from one of your earlier posts) what negative affect does that create in terms of wind loading? How do you propose to deal with that? In my own build putting 3 openings in a masonry wall caused the structure to fail wind load calculations with a traditional purlin and rafter roof, until the design was modified to include 2 large King Post trusses and their large tie beams. That's in a sheltered location compared to yours. So how is your current design going to fair - worse, comparatively speaking.
Is you nailing pattern for the OSB as per TRADA's recommendations, in terms of nailing pattern\density and nail spec?
What are your primary requirements from a roof? Ease of build? Headroom? Cost? Aesthetics? As these will dictate the options you have to choose from.
As for taking your comments the wrong way - don't worry about that, after all it's your shed. My comments earlier regarding pausing for thoughts still stand. I appreciate you might not see it, but to me this build, i.e. planning on the hoof, isn't the best way forward. You may pull it off or you may not. You may disagree - in which case we can agree to disagree.
Regards
Dibs