woodbloke
Established Member
We know :lol: ... - RobPaul Chapman":25avnz5m said:And I didn't even mention all the others :lol:
Cheers :wink:
Paul
We know :lol: ... - RobPaul Chapman":25avnz5m said:And I didn't even mention all the others :lol:
Cheers :wink:
Paul
matthewwh":3bd66twz said:Eric The Viking":3bd66twz said:I want to joint boards, probably no more than 4ft long, smooth surfaces, and generally get things square and flat.
At the risk of going 'against the grain' as it were, you can joint a tiddly 4 foot long piece with a 5 or 5-1/2 perfectly satisfactorily. If you want to do 6, 7, 8 foot long stuff and above then you will begin to see a benefit from a proper jointer.
If you want a long plane without the workout have a chat with Philly, but to be honest you can make a seamless joint with a jack at that size of workpiece - especially if you are lightly built yourself.
Eric The Viking":1u47tr4s said:It has a pretty worn out Record iron and chipbreaker, so will soon sport a standard Stanley blade for the time being (Ray Isles in due course, I hope).
bugbear":15hv8rfo said:Eric The Viking":15hv8rfo said:It has a pretty worn out Record iron and chipbreaker, so will soon sport a standard Stanley blade for the time being (Ray Isles in due course, I hope).
Given the amount of jointing most part time(*) woodworkers do, if the Record has more than 1/3" of cutting length, it's a lifetime's worth, and the old Record blades were good.
BugBear
(*) and full time woodworkers use power jointers, so them too!
jimi43":3cb9w7s3 said:ALWAYS use a screwdriver on all screws on a plane that both fits the width of the groove and depth perfectly. Some people (like me) get individual old flat ended screwdrivers from bootfairs and fettle them just for that purpose.
The irons that you can find vary in quality greatly...from the "cheese" ones of later years to the beautiful Hock, Lie Nielsen, Clifton and Iles ones available today for the price of a small family car. Be careful to choose ones that fit the mouth or that may be another job for you to do!
I like the Clifton double cap (Stay Set) also available from Axminster...but others hate them...[\quote]
I'm not a huge fan, mainly because I think it's a nuisance for honing - for me it physically gets in the way a bit (my fingers are clumsy). If I have to take it off, it defeats the object really.
But I'm keen on thicker irons, as the improvement is evident. I have a Japanese laminated blade in the #5, and that's brilliant too. It's a bit of a fiddle to grind - the first time I got it spot on, last time I really didn't quite get there (but I was bedding-in a new sharpening machine). I might go down that route, but the wider ones (2.3/8") are quite pricey, and as mentioned elsewhere, NOT SQUARE, which is a PITA.
Still pleased. I had a go at the tapped threads last night: all cleaned-up nicely, so the frog adjuster now works smoothly too.
Later...
E.
Eric The Viking":1zc3nf6c said:The Record iron that came with it looks interesting. I think it's cast (or cast+forged), rather than sheet steel. A previous owner has squared it off, I think with a file, at right angles, then comprehensively bogged-up the main bevel. It'll clean up nicely but has only about 1/2" of useful life in it (still enough really for me!).
bugbear":3mes7nke said:Eric The Viking":3mes7nke said:The Record iron that came with it looks interesting. I think it's cast (or cast+forged), rather than sheet steel. A previous owner has squared it off, I think with a file, at right angles, then comprehensively bogged-up the main bevel. It'll clean up nicely but has only about 1/2" of useful life in it (still enough really for me!).
A photo, especially of the top end (with markings, logo etc) would be helpful.
BugBear
Enter your email address to join: