NoviceJimbo
Member
Thanks i will have a look at the Sedgwick.
PS and the block in the photo didn't look in great condition to me! First thing you need to look at is that the clamp faces meet flat.
Modern blocks are "friction held" too, with a peg to stop them flying out if loose. I wonder if the hole for the peg makes the blade more liable to break, if other things go wrong? Half a cutter flying loose instead of the whole thing.
Limiters ditto, double the risk of flying blades.
So now they know (if they are reading this)!That’s because you have experience with these blocks, someone who doesn’t most likely wouldn’t spot that the jaws are splayed which are easy to see held up to the light like in that picture but difficult to spot sat on a bench. I think most would assume the block is good because the nuts aren’t rounded and it’s in a clean condition.
It was just a thought. I had one loose blade accident (shared machine somebody had started to remove a blade and not finished) and it simply shattered - part driven in to the workpiece and the rest in pieces in the machine well. It occurred to me that the pin hole might be a weak point and break sooner.I’ve never heard of a single instance of modern pinned cutters breaking, companies like Whitehill will actually tell you if a cutter profile you have made is at risk of breaking from too great of a projection or parts of the profile that are too thin, and will make it from a thicker steel to prevent breakage. I doubt that the pin holes would create any weakness as they’re so far into the block and the leverage on the cutter is right at the edge of the block itself where the cutter hangs out, not at the pin holes. The risk of cutters coming flying out of modern limiter blocks are near nil, even if you don’t tighten the wedge fully, centrifugal force will keep it in place during running.
I just went on google briefly and that axminster course I mentioned was being offered right up until the start of covid and I can’t tell if it has been started up again yet. So I’d just ring them. I would look into this as it seems to me all that you are lacking is confidence. It sounds like you have made similar windows before just smaller ones and not as many and this is why you have come up against the limitations of a router table. And I think you are right in your intuition that the joinery you plan to make would be extremely time consuming and painful with a router table: especially if you have to make a profit out of your time.Many thanks for all the advice. Lots of food for thought. The Axminster course is a great idea, DBC, and I will definitely look into that.
I have watched a lot of YouTube videos of the moulder in action, and one in particular by a chap called Roy Sutton was very good and covered some of the basics. However, I am old enough to know that the appearance given by an experienced woodworker on a video can make things look much easier than they actually are!
It is clear from all of you that new tooling is the best way to go, and I think also that I will have to increase my budget. I do really enjoy woodworking and with about 40 years before retirement, I will get a lot out of the investment!
Power is also something I will have to look into. I had planned to make the windows out of Sapele or Douglas fir which will likely need more power I am thinking? 3 phase is an option I will look into.
One further question I have is about table size. I assume a bigger table makes for a more versatile machine? I have noticed that some of the larger machines seem to have quite a small usable table. Does this matter too much?
I have seen what looks to be a very nice SMC T100 with Samco power feed in good working order. It looks a powerful machine though it is only 2 speed. Quite how I would get it into my garage I am not sure! From all of your advice it would seem that this is the sort of machine to look at.
There is also a nice Wadkin, but for double the cost! I think 1K is a more realistic budget really.
As said, I have used a router table to make small casement windows which turned out ok, about a 7/10, they certainly were not perfect. I just found that precision was difficult to achieve and setting up etc. the whole thing took an age. With 2 large bay windows, and 10 7 foot high, 4.5 foot wide monsters to build I might lose the will to live with the router table! also I would like to have a go at dados and skirtings, fancy mouldings etc.
Of course that is not to say that router tables are not effective, but I also have to consider my lack of skill/knowledge.
Many thanks to all of you and in advance for any further advice, Jimbo
Would a decent Kity 623 or similar be enough for windows doors, skirtings etc?
Have you looked on Facebook marketplace?Many thanks for all the advice. Lots of food for thought. The Axminster course is a great idea, DBC, and I will definitely look into that.
I have watched a lot of YouTube videos of the moulder in action, and one in particular by a chap called Roy Sutton was very good and covered some of the basics. However, I am old enough to know that the appearance given by an experienced woodworker on a video can make things look much easier than they actually are!
It is clear from all of you that new tooling is the best way to go, and I think also that I will have to increase my budget. I do really enjoy woodworking and with about 40 years before retirement, I will get a lot out of the investment!
Power is also something I will have to look into. I had planned to make the windows out of Sapele or Douglas fir which will likely need more power I am thinking? 3 phase is an option I will look into.
One further question I have is about table size. I assume a bigger table makes for a more versatile machine? I have noticed that some of the larger machines seem to have quite a small usable table. Does this matter too much?
I have seen what looks to be a very nice SMC T100 with Samco power feed in good working order. It looks a powerful machine though it is only 2 speed. Quite how I would get it into my garage I am not sure! From all of your advice it would seem that this is the sort of machine to look at.
There is also a nice Wadkin, but for double the cost! I think 1K is a more realistic budget really.
As said, I have used a router table to make small casement windows which turned out ok, about a 7/10, they certainly were not perfect. I just found that precision was difficult to achieve and setting up etc. the whole thing took an age. With 2 large bay windows, and 10 7 foot high, 4.5 foot wide monsters to build I might lose the will to live with the router table! also I would like to have a go at dados and skirtings, fancy mouldings etc.
Of course that is not to say that router tables are not effective, but I also have to consider my lack of skill/knowledge.
Many thanks to all of you and in advance for any further advice, Jimbo
What's wrong with a good old-fashioned Transwave rotary converter ?.....will need to look at the more expensive digital phase convertor ......
No, you don't need a more powerful machine for those types of wood.Many thanks for all the advice. Lots of food for thought. The Axminster course is a great idea, DBC, and I will definitely look into that.
I have watched a lot of YouTube videos of the moulder in action, and one in particular by a chap called Roy Sutton was very good and covered some of the basics. However, I am old enough to know that the appearance given by an experienced woodworker on a video can make things look much easier than they actually are!
It is clear from all of you that new tooling is the best way to go, and I think also that I will have to increase my budget. I do really enjoy woodworking and with about 40 years before retirement, I will get a lot out of the investment!
Power is also something I will have to look into. I had planned to make the windows out of Sapele or Douglas fir which will likely need more power I am thinking? 3 phase is an option I will look into.
One further question I have is about table size. I assume a bigger table makes for a more versatile machine? I have noticed that some of the larger machines seem to have quite a small usable table. Does this matter too much?
I have seen what looks to be a very nice SMC T100 with Samco power feed in good working order. It looks a powerful machine though it is only 2 speed. Quite how I would get it into my garage I am not sure! From all of your advice it would seem that this is the sort of machine to look at.
There is also a nice Wadkin, but for double the cost! I think 1K is a more realistic budget really.
As said, I have used a router table to make small casement windows which turned out ok, about a 7/10, they certainly were not perfect. I just found that precision was difficult to achieve and setting up etc. the whole thing took an age. With 2 large bay windows, and 10 7 foot high, 4.5 foot wide monsters to build I might lose the will to live with the router table! also I would like to have a go at dados and skirtings, fancy mouldings etc.
Of course that is not to say that router tables are not effective, but I also have to consider my lack of skill/knowledge.
Many thanks to all of you and in advance for any further advice, Jimbo
No you don't. I made a load of windows back in the day with a small Kity 636.Have you looked on Facebook marketplace?
You will need a quite heavy duty spindle moulder with power feed to do the windows you want to make.
if you had the room I’d say get a Wadkin EQ, there’s a few on Facebook abd can be had from £700 - £1200 they weigh about 700kg mind you.
I currently use a Wadkin EP - even older that EQ, fences and rise and fall are absolutely rock solid and smooth.
Nothing in the day but now we have three phase power conversion with no moving parts and precise phase alignment without needing capacitors to adjust and then don't forget rotary convertors will consume power with no load connected.What's wrong with a good old-fashioned Transwave rotary converter ?
Enter your email address to join: