My mistake - I did that from memory - and I should not have done that - I apologise (maybe my in-head figures are from across the privatised water industry??) What we both ought to be able to agree on, bearing in mind the sewage being pumped directly into rivers, is that the infrastructure is incontrovertibly in a bad state and in need of investment.
I too am comfortable and some might even say "well off" - and like you I do not begrudge or feel any anger towards "wealthier" folks than me. What I do feel is a cold, hard, unemotional, and dispassionate opinion that paying out huge dividends is not appropriate when the standard of the infrastructure is going backwards and the "extra efficiency" of private sector "competition" is proven to not exist - and could never exist from the outset - particularly when we can both clearly agree that private equity exists as a SOLE means to generate dividends/profit while everything else plays second fiddle, including investment, and good management - it's just another banks/rail/energy situation where profits are privatised and losses/costs are socialised.