YorkshireMartin
Established Member
Who said employing people was difficult or painted a bleak picture of the process?
I read it as everyone being very supportive?
I read it as everyone being very supportive?
YorkshireMartin":a4u5pxb7 said:Who said employing people was difficult or painted a bleak picture of the process?
I read it as everyone being very supportive?
YorkshireMartin":a4u5pxb7 said:I think even considering this is a noble thing all told.
Sadly, running a business these days is nothing but miles and miles of red tape, tied up in miles more. It's expensive. It makes it very hard for smaller companies to compete, and a one man band with a single apprentice even more so.
It sounds daunting and it is. But, it can be done, just not quickly or cheaply.
I'd like to add that colleges only serve a narrow demographic. I've been looking for 'adult' apprenticeships (behave) and according to government websites they exist somewhere but every apprenticeship I have found is geared towards 16 year olds.doctor Bob":3gl2fm3u said:Some people have posted a fairly bleak picture of employing people, most of it is way over the top.
If you want to employ an apprentice, go to your local college, it's exceptionally easy.
Unfortunately some of the employment advice on here seems to be from the daily mail brigade.
doctor Bob":gka0qp4e said:YorkshireMartin":gka0qp4e said:Who said employing people was difficult or painted a bleak picture of the process?
I read it as everyone being very supportive?
YorkshireMartin":gka0qp4e said:I think even considering this is a noble thing all told.
Sadly, running a business these days is nothing but miles and miles of red tape, tied up in miles more. It's expensive. It makes it very hard for smaller companies to compete, and a one man band with a single apprentice even more so.
It sounds daunting and it is. But, it can be done, just not quickly or cheaply.
I read it as you did, must just be reading this the wrong way. I certainly don't feel bogged down in miles and miles of red tape. There is a bit to do but it's all fairly easy and common sense, PAYE, pensions, HSE it's not complicated.
Adam9453":1tvxip3q said:Yorkshire Martin, it can certainly be daunting but doing a little research on google can often solve these problems or answer questions quickly and easily without the need for professional assistance. I can sympathise with how you feel as we're a small family business and I have to solve these kind of problems daily. The key I've found is to be proactive about hunting down a solution rather than worrying about the problem as such, if you see what I mean.
Forums can be a great help to discuss business related issues as often people have been in the same situation and can offer solutions, like any other problem really. The government and hse websites also have a lot of useful info.
I have employed a few apprentices and have found it overall rewarding to the business.
Mr_P":2gq3qwr1 said:I would have agreed with your statement 10-20 years ago but not today, sadly a degree these days only proves that someone spent 3 years plus at university.
Mr_P":e3r17kyc said:I would have agreed with your statement 10-20 years ago but not today, sadly a degree these days only proves that someone spent 3 years plus at university.
YorkshireMartin":2i25k9io said:... A couple of years ago, a client I consult for was taken to a tribunal by an employee who was made redundant for genuine reasons as the company was restructuring due to loss of a major client account. The employee's claim was for unfair dismissal and breach of contract. This is a common claim upon redundancy, almost automatic these days.
The claimant refused arbitration via ACAS. Following the hearing, it took the judge very little time to decide the case in favour of the respondent (company), as the employee had no genuine grounds for a claim and was, in the judge's words, not a credible witness...
...The overall cost to defend the spurious claim was in excess of £50,000 in legal fee's alone, not accounting for hundreds of hours of lost working time. The amount claimed by the claimant was in excess of £100,000 including claimable expenses post-dismissal. So overall, had the respondent set a foot wrong, they could have been looking at a bill of £200,000 including both sets of legal fee's but not including loss of working time, so add another £100,000 for that. By set a foot wrong, I mean literally something as simple as forgetting to allow the presence of a witness at a redundancy meeting, making a minor error in the appeals process or failing to maintain accurate records of interactions.
Enter your email address to join: