I can tell you that you get value for money with the Axminster saw and I use the sliding table more than I thought I would. Having said that, if you want a saw without the sliding table, the SIP would probably be the one I would have gone for as you can buy it for around £500 and they are a well known and respected tool manufacturer, I got the Axminster because it was about £300 cheaper than the SIP equivalent, governed by my budget.Gary":220n82tt said:Martin and Tony will be along soon to tell you all about the Axminster.
:^oGary":6ie4lgqh said:Told you so Andy.
motownmartin":1tzkxtvo said::^oGary":1tzkxtvo said:Told you so Andy.
Gary":1o16mc2a said:motownmartin":1o16mc2a said::^oGary":1o16mc2a said:Told you so Andy.
Well 24 minutes is soon in my book.
OLD":1d4iigod said:The axminster has a sliding table so is much larger .If its left off they are similar size but you have to buy what you do not use .
Castors locking ones are the answer in a small shop make your own transporters with four quality steering castors, from your diagram for the table saw and router table then move things around to suit the job .
If the router table was the same height as the table saw it could be used as a out feed table.
It also a good idea to have all benches and tables the same height it helps to give support to larger jobs
andycorleone":61y1x6b0 said:How useful is the sliding attachment? Seeing it look like can be handy for Cross cut capacity ? or do do you think the miter gauge is more than enough?
Enter your email address to join: