Benchwayze":jcugbvrn said:Jelly":jcugbvrn said:I have a problem with cheap flatpack furniture, the kind that doesn't try to hide the inelegant methods of construction (not even joinery)...
By contrast Ikea stuff is a shining example that it's possible to produce economical flatpack furniture with excellent design. Ok it tends towards a minimalist school, but it's furniture, not just frames, planks and boxes.
I also dislike most intensely overly square designs for chairs, humans are after all... curved.
Ah well Jelly,
There's much less work and skill in making the back legs of a chair upright, and in making the seat square.
I think that's where those designs come from.
All I would say is that cutting 'swept' back-legs is a tad more wasteful of timber, but then so is turning and carving; where most of the raw material finishes up on the floor, and eventually in the wood-burner! :wink:
It may be for that reason that i'm a big fan of steam-bent pieces and postformed laminated furniture, when it's done well it's every bit as impressive as intricate carved pieces... but it's a whole other relm of woodworking techniques.
I've actually found furniture i hate now though... machine made copies of period furniture which are intentionally made of poor materials and with poor finishing to create instant "shabby chic"... it makes me want to scream "go round a blooming junkshop you lazy pretentious sods" which is probably a tad harsh.
When you're trying to make a feature of crumbling dead knots in whitewood that clearly wasn't going to pass strength grading, you're doing it wrong.