Valves in a fluid system do two jobs:
- isolate the flow
- control the flow
An isolation valve is typically designed to be either open or closed, and to achieve this with the minimum of efforts. Quarter turn ball valves are a great example of this technology.
Control valves are designed to reduce flow and pressure in a controlled way. They typically operate partially open/closed. To enable accurate control they typically go from open to closed over multiple turns of the handle.
Any valve that is open, fully or partially, will only result in a pressure drop when fluids are flowing. Whether you install a stopcock, gate valve, quarter turn ball etc if the valve is open even a fraction then the pressure in your pipe work will equal your supply pressure when there is no flow. You would need a PRV to actively reduce the pressure, this valve monitors the pressure in your system and opens/closes to maintain the pressure at the set pressure. I’ve never seen a PRV in any of the houses I’ve lived in but looking on line they are available.
When the supply pressure is not abnormally high then it can be helpful to run the stopcock partly open/closed, this will reduce the maximum flow rate from the supply, and can help with some dynamic effects like water hammer. A quarter turn ball valve is not a great choice in this situation as a small position change results in a large flow change, so it’s hard to set in a useful position. Additionally the valve will be noisy in operation as it is not designed to operate in this fashion. A regular stopcock, not a gate valve, would be a better choice in this situation. Personally I would go for a quarter turn isolation valve and a traditional stop cock for control.
If you take one thing from this post it’s that a quarter turn ball valve is a poor choice for controlling flow.
Fitz.
- isolate the flow
- control the flow
An isolation valve is typically designed to be either open or closed, and to achieve this with the minimum of efforts. Quarter turn ball valves are a great example of this technology.
Control valves are designed to reduce flow and pressure in a controlled way. They typically operate partially open/closed. To enable accurate control they typically go from open to closed over multiple turns of the handle.
Any valve that is open, fully or partially, will only result in a pressure drop when fluids are flowing. Whether you install a stopcock, gate valve, quarter turn ball etc if the valve is open even a fraction then the pressure in your pipe work will equal your supply pressure when there is no flow. You would need a PRV to actively reduce the pressure, this valve monitors the pressure in your system and opens/closes to maintain the pressure at the set pressure. I’ve never seen a PRV in any of the houses I’ve lived in but looking on line they are available.
When the supply pressure is not abnormally high then it can be helpful to run the stopcock partly open/closed, this will reduce the maximum flow rate from the supply, and can help with some dynamic effects like water hammer. A quarter turn ball valve is not a great choice in this situation as a small position change results in a large flow change, so it’s hard to set in a useful position. Additionally the valve will be noisy in operation as it is not designed to operate in this fashion. A regular stopcock, not a gate valve, would be a better choice in this situation. Personally I would go for a quarter turn isolation valve and a traditional stop cock for control.
If you take one thing from this post it’s that a quarter turn ball valve is a poor choice for controlling flow.
Fitz.