stuartpaul
Established Member
Jacob":2uhd105y said:snip
How I would transfer the same level of caution to an employee is another question altogether.
Just out of interest Jacob do you have employees?
Jacob":2uhd105y said:snip
How I would transfer the same level of caution to an employee is another question altogether.
Not at the mo. I'm virtually retired. But if I was going to inflict my alternative methods on employees I'd be very circumspect about it - perhaps consult HSE.stuartpaul":1n6x8o7d said:Jacob":1n6x8o7d said:snip
How I would transfer the same level of caution to an employee is another question altogether.
Just out of interest Jacob do you have employees?
Jacob":z5vfk81n said:Is this your last post - again?
rhrwilliams":soquxcg1 said:Going slightly back to the original topic , I thought I'd let everyone know despite it probably not being most sensible idea , I've bought the spindle moulder anyway as I couldn't resist the lure of it !
RogerS":2d0nc590 said:Now, if we could perhaps return to the two questions ?
1) What exactly in the codes makes precise copying difficult, impossible, impossibly expensive (not that I agree with those last three comments either) ?
We have been talking mainly about limiters, for example. Limiters don't come into contact with the stock so how in God's name can you come up with your statement above?
blackrodd":3um36pg7 said:Looking at you're original post, glad you have bought the spindle, were you able to have a demo and the chance to buy any up to date tooling?
As you are able to see by previous posts The moulder needs treating with respect and a day with someone like Peter Sefton, if he's not too far away, will pay dividends as you should then have some knowledge of what you should do, or not to do!
It could be said, The Shaw guard is really a pressure system, which when set up properly, holds the timber stock, being worked, snug and securely in place, against the fence.
With the shaw guard in place, you're hands now have no need or purpose to be near the cutters or cutter block.
Even for trial/test cuts, the shaw guard will be in place, and the stock is fed continuously, nose to tail, when possible, and do not use a push stick on end of the the final piece, use another sacrificial piece.
You're starting with a decent make, which is halfway there.
HTH Regards Rodders
James-1986":9c9ympmd said:RogerS":9c9ympmd said:Now, if we could perhaps return to the two questions ?
1) What exactly in the codes makes precise copying difficult, impossible, impossibly expensive (not that I agree with those last three comments either) ?
We have been talking mainly about limiters, for example. Limiters don't come into contact with the stock so how in God's name can you come up with your statement above?
You have to grind 4 bits of metal rather than 1. The limiters need to be accurately ground in relation to the cutters to comply with the regs. You need expensive machinery if you want to do it yourself. The block needs to be a very precise fit on the spindle if you want it cutting on two.
My Wadkin safety blocks are far cheaper and far quicker to setup than modern chip limited tooling; end of story. The only way you can get the best out of modern tooling is with the correct grinding and setting machines, simply not worth it for the small timers like me.
Peter Sefton":30gbqka0 said:If using push stick on the spindle moulder make sure they pass the cutter block on the outside of the shaw guard!
I worked in a workshop where they were banned on the spindle moulder. They told me of a case where the push stick was kicked back after contact with the block and ended up splitting and shooting up inside the workers arm. This is why I won't let them be used on my planer and rather use a full size spare to push the last piece through the spindle between shaw guards in both directions or better still the power feed.
Cheers Peter
I think that story is totally improbable. I can safely poke my plywood push stick into the block and it just gets neatly trimmed. And I poke it between the shaw guard and the fence if necessary. Absolutely no problem, as safe as houses. They often get chopped or trimmed and I make a new setPeter Sefton":21iz9562 said:If using push stick on the spindle moulder make sure they pass the cutter block on the outside of the shaw guard!
I worked in a workshop where they were banned on the spindle moulder. They told me of a case where the push stick was kicked back after contact with the block and ended up splitting and shooting up inside the workers arm. This is why I won't let them be used on my planer and rather use a full size spare to push the last piece through the spindle between shaw guards in both directions or better still the power feed.
Cheers Peter
I agree with all that but in the absence of power feed using push sticks (as per my earlier post) gives you a longer reach, more control and a steadier throughput without changing hands so much, so the end product is better. They are like arm extensions.RobinBHM":dnf7bsqs said:I have always believed heavy duty spindle moulders should come with power feed units as part of the package but only very top end machines, such Martin and SCM have such an option. No joinery company would use a spindle without a power feed. It is so easy to set that it is worth using for running a single piece.
A power feed transforms the use of a spindle moulder in consistency, ease of use, safety etc. Once youve used a power fed spindle you wouldnt want to go back to pressure guards. Working with shaw guards it is impossible to maintain a constant feed rate and actually pretty difficult to not stop during hand changeover.
Enter your email address to join: