engineer one
Established Member
ok back doing some more woodworking, and discussing things in person with some other carpenters, i ask a question.
given that we have so much adjustment on metal planes now, why do we need to give the blade a curve?
i can understand when planes were all of wood, (except blade) then having a curve was useful for the average woodworker, since it meant that adjustments were easier.
now however, particularly with the new LV and even LN and Clifton planes, there are various devices for ensuring that the blade is square across the mouth, and if you have angled it that the blade is accurate across the face. so why the curve?
if you try the plane on the edges of a piece of wood, and you get even shavings,then surely that is all that matters.
the reason i ask is that we seem to be getting to a point where new people
are scared off hand work because the perceived wisdom is that your tools have to be perfect.
wood solid wood does not allow for real engineering standards, it moves, so why worry about accuracy of microns when taking off shavings, too little clearance and the draw won't open or the cabinet will distort due to bad design.
surely the important thing is for people, both pro and amateur to actually make things and complete them, not buy pretty tools to look at.
i think many people have taken the sharpening story too far, and are in danger of overemphasizing the value of it. if your plane is easy to push and you get a reasonably flat surface, should that not be enough.
the old cabinet makers would i think laugh at our over concern for
flatness.
my recent experience suggests that sharpening should work as follows,
use a powered wheel to get your bevel back quickly, i use a tormek,
then flatten the back on a stone, or diamond surface, and the work the bevel to get a good cutting edge with a honing guide and end up with a japanese stone, these moves don't take too long and allow you to be as sharp as you want.
maybe i am just being contentious but seems to me the prime objective is to make things of beauty which we use or sell. sometimes it is easy to teach too long, and then think that production work has to have the same time consuming input.
no slings no arrows, just a thought for honest comment.
paul :?
given that we have so much adjustment on metal planes now, why do we need to give the blade a curve?
i can understand when planes were all of wood, (except blade) then having a curve was useful for the average woodworker, since it meant that adjustments were easier.
now however, particularly with the new LV and even LN and Clifton planes, there are various devices for ensuring that the blade is square across the mouth, and if you have angled it that the blade is accurate across the face. so why the curve?
if you try the plane on the edges of a piece of wood, and you get even shavings,then surely that is all that matters.
the reason i ask is that we seem to be getting to a point where new people
are scared off hand work because the perceived wisdom is that your tools have to be perfect.
wood solid wood does not allow for real engineering standards, it moves, so why worry about accuracy of microns when taking off shavings, too little clearance and the draw won't open or the cabinet will distort due to bad design.
surely the important thing is for people, both pro and amateur to actually make things and complete them, not buy pretty tools to look at.
i think many people have taken the sharpening story too far, and are in danger of overemphasizing the value of it. if your plane is easy to push and you get a reasonably flat surface, should that not be enough.
the old cabinet makers would i think laugh at our over concern for
flatness.
my recent experience suggests that sharpening should work as follows,
use a powered wheel to get your bevel back quickly, i use a tormek,
then flatten the back on a stone, or diamond surface, and the work the bevel to get a good cutting edge with a honing guide and end up with a japanese stone, these moves don't take too long and allow you to be as sharp as you want.
maybe i am just being contentious but seems to me the prime objective is to make things of beauty which we use or sell. sometimes it is easy to teach too long, and then think that production work has to have the same time consuming input.
no slings no arrows, just a thought for honest comment.
paul :?