Sheffield Tony":23k1duz4 said:
Green woodworkers rule of thumb, popularised by Mike Abbott, is to allow 10% for drying shrinkage.
That's interesting. I wonder if he meant to
up to 10% rather than actually allowing 10%? There aren't really very many species of wood that, as they dry from fibre saturation point (FSP, ~30% MC and above), down to 0% MC that might shrink tangentially by 10% or more. In addition, radial shrinkage tends to be in the region of approximately half the shrinkage of tangential shrinkage. Further, most wood in use in artifacts never gets down to 0% MC, something that only normally occurs during an oven drying test used to determine moisture content of the wood prior to the testing. In use, wood used in furniture located in habitable buildings tends to range in MC from perhaps 7% - ~13% MC.
I'm not disputing the utility of allowing for shrinkage and expansion in the forming of the joints where a wetter seat, air dried for example to about 20% MC has a hole bored in it to accept a drier leg spigot starting at, say, 7% MC, and other joints utilising this technique. The technique is well known, I'm just curious about the amount of allowance of 10% shrinkage you mention.
Here's a selection of wood species that typically shrink tangentially by ±10% as they dry from FSP to 0% MC. Of all the wood species for which I have figures, the following list encompasses approximately 25% of their number. I excluded from this list pretty anything with a shrinkage factor of less than 9%, with the exception European oak at 8.9%, as can be seen. Slainte.
American basswood: 9.3%
American beech: 11.9%
European beech: 10.7%
Yellow birch: 9.5%
African ebony: 10.8%
American elm: 9.5%
Shagbark hickory: 10.5%
Hop-hornbeam: 10%
American hornbeam: 11.4%
Jarrah: 11%
Keruing: 10.9%
Lime: 9.3%
Pacific madrone: 12.4%
Hard maple: 9.9%
American white oak: 10.4%
European oak: 8.9%
European sycamore: 9.9%