YorkshireMartin
Established Member
graduate_owner":x09g9pwm said:What gets me is inconsistency. I was reading our local rag some while ago and magistrates fined a driver who had no insurance or MOT, and no full driving licence - he was fined something like £150. In ths same newspaper, the same magistrates fined a motorist £250 for not wearing a seat belt. So what harm and what potential danger is the second motorist doing by his criminal actions, other than possible danger to himself? Whereas the first - not passed a driving test?
K
Mitigation. The fine starts at the maximum and then mitigating factors are applied which reduce it. I think.
So, one guy had more mitigating factors than the other. Vehicle for employment, young family etc.
This is a half guess. It works in a similar way for prison sentences.
Anyone see the guy in the news recently who was driving a truck and using not one, but two mobile phones, at the same time?! http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...ter-news/hgv-driver-caught-using-two-11982376