Nicholson work bench - replacement top options?

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Wilko54321

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2025
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Location
London
Hi, I’m looking to refurb the old Nicholson bench that came with our house. Stored in an unheated shed. In Barking, so materials need to be delivered as I don’t have car.

The old one is not level due to wear. I want a flatter surface to work on for glue ups etc. Bench is 1500mm long by 640mm wide, top is ~42mm thick front/back and ~22mm in the middle. Frame is old actual sized 2x4. Top pieces are nailed down. I’m looking to add a stretcher at the back, braces under the ends and new vice jaws.

I’ve got a track saw, decent range of power and hand tools etc., but I don’t have large shop stuff like a planer/table saw. I had thought of stretcher brackets underneath, coach screws or fixed down with recessed washer head screws.

Any other replacement work surface suggestions or fixing options?

Option 1 - Single piece hardwood plywood top with 2-3 layers of 18mm glued together and edged

Option 2 - glue together 44 x44mm redwood to only replace the worn front piece and plane to size

IMG_4501.jpeg
IMG_4506.jpeg
 
I would have a rethink about a "refurb", time to make a new one, its clearly had a hard life, and owes you nothing, you will spend far more time, effort and money in making it usable.

There is a saying I would use, but I'm too polite to express it fully on here, so I'll use a 3 letter acronym: P. A. T.
 
I would have a rethink about a "refurb", time to make a new one, its clearly had a hard life, and owes you nothing, you will spend far more time, effort and money in making it usable.

There is a saying I would use, but I'm too polite to express it fully on here, so I'll use a 3 letter acronym: P. A. T.
Yeah, I did think about that actually.

Silks purse and sow’s ear should pass any mod checks for politeness 😉

I will have a think, the Paul Sellers or Rob Cosman style bench builds seemed fun and not impossible to pull off.

We might be moving within a couple of years, so could make sense to just take the very deep vice and adjustable planing stop for the next build as they are better than modern stuff.
 
Nothing particularly "Nicholson" about it, it's just a variety of the standard bench found everywhere. Nicholson's book just happens to illustrate his version of a very common and basic bench design.
If the legs and the aprons add up to a sturdy and rigid bench I'd replace the two top bench beams with something about the same size (2"x10" perhaps?) in redwood, or a hardwood if you want to spend a bit. Beech is popular. Replace the well with a bit of ply, the extra depth is useful.
Seller's bench is just ringing the changes on the same design. He only has one "beam" which is fine for one person. The back apron needs to be fairly sturdy and level with the beam.
Cosman bench is over fussy, I wouldn't bother.
I always think of the work surfaces as the "beam" plus back apron, or beams if there are two - the most basic bench of all being the Japanese planing beam, which consist of just one heavy joist.
PS there's a fashion for one piece heavyweight tops with no well. I'd avoid that altogether as they are difficult to make and keep flat and the well is really useful.
 
Last edited:
Nothing particularly "Nicholson" about it, it's just a variety of the standard bench found everywhere. Nicholson's book just happens to illustrate his version of a very common and basic bench design.
If the legs and the aprons add up to a sturdy and rigid bench I'd replace the two top bench beams with something about the same size (2"x10" perhaps?) in redwood, or a hardwood if you want to spend a bit. Beech is popular. Replace the well with a bit of ply, the extra depth is useful.
Seller's bench is just ringing the changes on the same design. He only has one "beam" which is fine for one person. The back apron needs to be fairly sturdy and level with the beam.
Cosman bench is over fussy, I wouldn't bother.
I always think of the work surfaces as the "beam" plus back apron, or beams if there are two - the most basic bench of all being the Japanese planing beam, which consist of just one heavy joist.
PS there's a fashion for one piece heavyweight tops with no well. I'd avoid that altogether as they are difficult to make and keep flat and the well is really useful.
Thanks for the context and suggestions. The legs and aprons are solid, the bench isn’t moving anywhere as on two sides it’s against the shed framing so stays in place nicely.

Definitely some options to consider!
 
If you are considering that you only need two years out of it I think all I would do is turn the top three bits over, but also swap the front and back planks. Jobs a goodun.
Ian
I agree. It was common practice to replace or rotate boards to refresh the top. I guess thats one of the reasons the top was nailed down. Makes it an easier job.
The vice would be worth keeping. Been a few threads on here on those.
Regards
John
 
Back
Top