But it's not up to you to say that; if Blister had said that in the first place instead of challenging my capability, then I would have accepted that I had partially high jacked his thread and no more would have been said. I take it that the point you are trying to make is that I have devalued the sale because I seem to be criticising the product - how very weird an attitude is all I can say.
And to use the word 'objectionable' is highly emotive as was 'clumsy' etc. My post was almost a musing - "I've made a design mistake - but interesting other panels have the same layout"
I am now looking as to how I refer this to the moderators. If there is a rule about high jacking in any form then everyone must be abided by it - there are many posts here which drift off subject and gain by doing so. It never occurred to me that my musing would be found to unacceptable.
OW
And to use the word 'objectionable' is highly emotive as was 'clumsy' etc. My post was almost a musing - "I've made a design mistake - but interesting other panels have the same layout"
I am now looking as to how I refer this to the moderators. If there is a rule about high jacking in any form then everyone must be abided by it - there are many posts here which drift off subject and gain by doing so. It never occurred to me that my musing would be found to unacceptable.
OW