NeiljohnUK
Member
Isn't it cute.
Some contributors have done 15mins of Google.
Maybe 30 mins, at a stretch.
And then framing their argument to disagree with people who have literally dedicated their entire academic and working lives in researching a specific topic.
Having recently retired from Academia, and research, where I worked with a number of climate 'change' agenda doubting Physicists I too doubt much of what is put out. That research funding rarely goes to those who question, and peer review is often entirely one sided is a major problem in 'science' (STEM subjects).
The roofing issue, with bitumen or wood shingles, may be a large part of the issue, steel and terracotta much less so, with red hot embers (large embers) being blown hundreds of yards by the high winds, well beyond separation distances suggested by some. Another issue is the number of imported eucalyptus (fire) trees.