Alf
Established Member
Cynic.ike":3irryf8v said:Alf wrote:
If you're making tools I doubt you'll find a tap and die set is a one time purchase.
If you mean as in wearing out
Cheers, Alf
Cynic.ike":3irryf8v said:Alf wrote:
If you're making tools I doubt you'll find a tap and die set is a one time purchase.
If you mean as in wearing out
ike":2bfvcp9n said:Alf wrote:
If you're making tools I doubt you'll find a tap and die set is a one time purchase.
If you mean as in wearing out, all cheapo sets are carbon steel and will quickly oblige. My money saving tip is don't buy the set - buy individual taps/dies as required, as many of the sizes in a typical set probably will never get used.
Buy HSS ones (like Dormer etc)from the local engineering supplies. They should last a very long time (unless you break them).
Ike
George_N":1d0snvsd said:johnelliott":1d0snvsd said:Time we big spenders put forward some of our ideas on how to do woodworking tasks without expensive machines.
Here's the first of mine-
When I first started making guitar necks, years ago, I needed to thickness pieces of maple, approximately 900mm long and 100m wide. No money for a planer thicknesser and no space either.
I did have a 1/4 router, though, so this is what I did. Sorry, no pics. I made a table big enough to hold the maple blanks, then attached two pieces of steel to form rails above the level of the wood. Then I mounted the router on another two rails which bridged across the table rails. I fitted a 25mm face cutter to the router
To use the device, I fixed the maple so that the top face was sort of parallel to the table. Then I skated the router to and fro across the wood and skimmed it til it was flat. Then I turned it over and fixed the blank flat to the table. Skim the other side and, if carefully done, one perfectly thicknessed piece of maple!
I would then let the wood settle for a couple of days before the final skims. The results were at least as good as could be obtained with a planer thicknesser
I shall look forward to reading other poster's methods for bypassing the big spending route to woodworking (I realise that we have already had a good many of these eg Tony's thread on modifying circular saws)
John
There is something similar described in "Woodworking with the router" by Bill Hylton. In the book he says it's fine for small amounts of timber but not really feasible for larger amounts. I guess guitar neck blanks would come into the small category but I wouldn't want to do a kitchen's worth of cabinet doors by that method.
cheers
George
Alf":1db6y4t9 said:Hand toolsjohnelliott":1db6y4t9 said:Time we big spenders put forward some of our ideas on how to do woodworking tasks without expensive machines.
That was easy. Next? :wink:
Cheers, Alf
Paul Chapman":3kubgnk4 said:Chippendale managed without all that stuff,
Chippendale managed without all that stuff,
Chippendale managed without all that stuff..........
Cynic.
And his debts when he died were terrible...tim":gjgd3z57 said:Paul Chapman":gjgd3z57 said:Chippendale managed without all that stuff,
Chippendale managed without all that stuff,
Chippendale managed without all that stuff..........
two things:
he would have used them if they were available - market forces would have dictated that
and in fact Chippendale did have power tools, organic ones ie apprentices
I was going to be impressed and ask how many braces and hand drills you have, until it dawned on me that probably doesn't mean your workshop is a power drill-free zone. #-oPaul Chapman":gjgd3z57 said:no cordless drills or drivers