There isn’t a sticking point - we’re not using glue …I still don't understand what your sticking point is about T&G.
Your approach is somewhat unconventional, although your understanding of wood expansion/contraction is good. It's true that total expansion and shrinkage of, say, 10 tangentially sawn red pine boards 100 mm wide at their driest in service will be the same whether joined together into one wider panel of 1000 mm wide or individually. In this example let's say each board expands and contracts by 2 mm over the seasons, i.e., in this case between 100 and 102 mm meaning a total range of movement of 20 mm annually. That is, as you evidently understand, 10 boards X 2 mm of expansion/contraction = 20 mm, or those 10 boards glued together to make a 1000 mm wide panel which would result in 20 mm expansion/contraction.So when the piece in the center needs to expand, it has to push both sides 500mm?
Why would it catch? Why would it split? There is nothing holding it in position other than gravity and a little friction. BTW this is 1800mm and has moved freely for 10 years.
This is nothing more than a basic frame and panel construction, some of the members don't seem to understand that and think I've broken some long held woodworking rule.
In my (exaggerated) example, it's nothing more than a large FLOATING panel that just happens to be made of several pieces glued together. The same process used in a much narrower gate would pose no problems as many seem to think.
I did not break the frame and panel rules. Please don't call the wood police.
So when the piece in the center needs to expand, it has to push both sides 500mm?
Why would it catch? Why would it split? There is nothing holding it in position other than gravity and a little friction. BTW this is 1800mm and has moved freely for 10 years.
This is nothing more than a basic frame and panel construction, some of the members don't seem to understand that and think I've broken some long held woodworking rule.
In my (exaggerated) example, it's nothing more than a large FLOATING panel that just happens to be made of several pieces glued together. The same process used in a much narrower gate would pose no problems as many seem to think.
I did not break the frame and panel rules. Please don't call the wood police.
There is if there is major change in humidity. From very dry to very wet you'd expect a total horizontal movement of an inch or more in such a large panel, if that was possible at all in such a long slot. I'd expect it to snag and split.Let me be perfectly clear the T&G boards are glued to each other NOT the frame. It's nothing more than a large floating panel, no different than a solid piece. There is no reason that it should fail.
Same as "slab sawn"? It's all I ever see in T&G or any plain boards in N European redwood. Heart wood and knots to the middle, sap wood to the edges......
Just for fun I did some sums using your 1800 mm wide panel made out of tangentially sawn (T&G boards are always tangentially sawn) ...
Yes, and also commonly called through and through, slash sawn, plain sawn and crown cut. Slainte.Same as "slab sawn"?
I'm not sure why people are so anti your suggestion. I can fully understand your point. If you look at front doors in the uk, you'll often find ones like this https://www.doorsonlineuk.co.uk/ext.../stable-9l-arched-mt-hardwood-external-doors/ and it certainly doesn't look like T+G floating in the bottom panel. Instead it is basically what you have done which is create a single panel from separate pieces, as there is no way they have a ~28inch plank to create it in one piece.I still don't understand what your sticking point is about T&G.
What if it was just a wide (glued together) flat panel? Would that make a difference in your mind?
With all due respect, to the "informed UK sources";
This is only T&G for the appearance sake, it really makes no difference what the edge profile is. It's just a wide frame and panel construction.
The T&G really does not come into play, I'm not laying a traditional floor, it's a primarily decorative panel.
I'm not sure what is so difficult to wrap you head around.
None of you have yet to tell me what woodworking "rules" I've broken. All I hear is fear mongering that it will fail and so far after a decade it hasn't.
End of
Yes, but if unglued it's spread over more gaps...Making a solid panel will make the entire structure stiffer.
There are many ways to approach this.
Also, you need the same amount of room to accommodate movement of several small panels, as you do for 1 large panel, the panel is the same size no matter how you divide it up.
I'm not sure why people are so anti your suggestion. I can fully understand your point. If you look at front doors in the uk, you'll often find ones like this https://www.doorsonlineuk.co.uk/ext.../stable-9l-arched-mt-hardwood-external-doors/ and it certainly doesn't look like T+G floating in the bottom panel. Instead it is basically what you have done which is create a single panel from separate pieces, as there is no way they have a ~28inch plank to create it in one piece.
Doesn't seem to be a huge issue either way
maybe, maybe not. My front door is definitely solid although smaller panels. each panel is ~8inches and is made of more than one piece glued together. Been there way before I got the house 10 years ago and hasn't had a problem despite me not doing a lot of maintenance on it.It says the door in the link is constructed of engineered hardwood, this can mean ply or even MDF, I very much doubt the panel in that door is solid wood.
Enter your email address to join: