Steve Maskery
Established Member
A frame and panel door, with a raised and fielded panel and cope-and-stick moulding is a classic design that continues to look good today.
Originally, of course, the work was all done by hand, using moulding planes for the sticking, gouges to cope the ends of the rails, and hand planes to create the field. All those tools are still available for the neanderthal woodworker, and although it might well be peaceful and satisfying work to do, it is also very time-consuming.
For many years we have been able to get router bits which do the hard work for us. The cope and stile are usually a matched pair, one to cut the sticking and the other to cut the mating cope. You do need to have a decent router table to use them and they have to be set up properly, but they do produce good results.
One of the weaknesses of them, however, is that there is quite a bit of trial and error to get the second cutter to exactly the right height. Too high or too low and the groove for the panel will not line up all the way round. And if you have a little accident with a workpiece later on, going back to make a replacement part means going through all that set-up routine all over again.
There are now, however, a range of router cutters that cut both the cope and the stick. Both profiles are on the same cutter and the intention of the manufacturer is that we alter the height to use whichever part of the profile we need to use. But whilst this does mean we don't have to swap cutters, we still have the issue of precise setting of the height.
I have a good idea!
Instead of altering the height of the cutter, why don't we leave the cutter where it is and alter the height of the workpiece? As well as being faster, it's also easy to go back later and make a replacement part (provided that I've not taken the cutter out, of course).
In order to achieve this I use a sled to cut the coped ends of the rails. This is done using the upper part of the profile, so the critical dimension is the thickness of the sled. I measured the pitch of the cutter (the distance from the part that cuts the tongue to the part that cuts the groove) at 22mm. As we shall see in a minute, that was not quite accurate enough, but that was my starting point.
I had an old push-stick that was at the end of its life, so I recycled it to become a handle and fixed it to the base. I actually biscuited it, but I wish I'd simply screwed it, for reasons which will become apparent in a moment.
A fence is screwed across the base and a couple of toggle clamps fitted.
Job done.
Or so I thought.
Originally, of course, the work was all done by hand, using moulding planes for the sticking, gouges to cope the ends of the rails, and hand planes to create the field. All those tools are still available for the neanderthal woodworker, and although it might well be peaceful and satisfying work to do, it is also very time-consuming.
For many years we have been able to get router bits which do the hard work for us. The cope and stile are usually a matched pair, one to cut the sticking and the other to cut the mating cope. You do need to have a decent router table to use them and they have to be set up properly, but they do produce good results.
One of the weaknesses of them, however, is that there is quite a bit of trial and error to get the second cutter to exactly the right height. Too high or too low and the groove for the panel will not line up all the way round. And if you have a little accident with a workpiece later on, going back to make a replacement part means going through all that set-up routine all over again.
There are now, however, a range of router cutters that cut both the cope and the stick. Both profiles are on the same cutter and the intention of the manufacturer is that we alter the height to use whichever part of the profile we need to use. But whilst this does mean we don't have to swap cutters, we still have the issue of precise setting of the height.
I have a good idea!
Instead of altering the height of the cutter, why don't we leave the cutter where it is and alter the height of the workpiece? As well as being faster, it's also easy to go back later and make a replacement part (provided that I've not taken the cutter out, of course).
In order to achieve this I use a sled to cut the coped ends of the rails. This is done using the upper part of the profile, so the critical dimension is the thickness of the sled. I measured the pitch of the cutter (the distance from the part that cuts the tongue to the part that cuts the groove) at 22mm. As we shall see in a minute, that was not quite accurate enough, but that was my starting point.
I had an old push-stick that was at the end of its life, so I recycled it to become a handle and fixed it to the base. I actually biscuited it, but I wish I'd simply screwed it, for reasons which will become apparent in a moment.
A fence is screwed across the base and a couple of toggle clamps fitted.
Job done.
Or so I thought.