gidon
Established Member
I'm (still) after some new chisels - my Footprint chisels have done me proud - but I want to move them into my DIY toolbox.
So was looking at the Ashley Iles bevel edge chisels or the LN's. I think the LN's are really too much for me to justify at the moment which brings to my question:
The AI chisels get pretty well reviewed here, apart from their hollow ground backs. I've spoken to classichandtools.com and he confirms this is a real problem with these chisels and he gets lots back. I've also spoken to Ray Iles who says this hollow grind is deliberate and you don't need the whole back flat - easier to polish the important bit with a hollow grind. Of course the argument for completely polished backs is the idea of registering the chisel back correctly for paring etc. So I can see both arguments but would be interested to hear people's thoughts - I don't really want to go for the AI chisels and spend forever flattening the backs. My Footprints have got polished backs (which took a long time at the time IIRC) - but really can't imagine for woodworking tolerences, registering error due to an uneven back is ever going to amount to more than user error?
classichandtools.com also reckon the Sorby chisels are a better buy - but there are mixed reports about them here.
Any others I should be considering (I don't like the London Pattern handles which rules the Two Cherries out for me.)
Cheers
Gidon
So was looking at the Ashley Iles bevel edge chisels or the LN's. I think the LN's are really too much for me to justify at the moment which brings to my question:
The AI chisels get pretty well reviewed here, apart from their hollow ground backs. I've spoken to classichandtools.com and he confirms this is a real problem with these chisels and he gets lots back. I've also spoken to Ray Iles who says this hollow grind is deliberate and you don't need the whole back flat - easier to polish the important bit with a hollow grind. Of course the argument for completely polished backs is the idea of registering the chisel back correctly for paring etc. So I can see both arguments but would be interested to hear people's thoughts - I don't really want to go for the AI chisels and spend forever flattening the backs. My Footprints have got polished backs (which took a long time at the time IIRC) - but really can't imagine for woodworking tolerences, registering error due to an uneven back is ever going to amount to more than user error?
classichandtools.com also reckon the Sorby chisels are a better buy - but there are mixed reports about them here.
Any others I should be considering (I don't like the London Pattern handles which rules the Two Cherries out for me.)
Cheers
Gidon