As near as makes no difference in practice (i.e. adhere to the Regs unless you are an EE who knows what they are doing to the nth degree and can justify it), but technically, the Part P Approved Doc doesn't prescribe following the Regs, instead, it adopts the safety aims of the Regs, and just says that one way of demonstrating that you have met those aims is to follow the Regs.
And, to add some more legalism, the Approved Doc is itself only guidance to meeting the requirements of Part P itself - the only actual legal requirement is the very short statement that reasonable provision shall be made in the design and installation of electrical installations to protect from fire or injury.
None of the above is likely to carry any weight with a BC officer unless you are one of said EEs, so in practice you are right.
And, to add some more legalism, the Approved Doc is itself only guidance to meeting the requirements of Part P itself - the only actual legal requirement is the very short statement that reasonable provision shall be made in the design and installation of electrical installations to protect from fire or injury.
None of the above is likely to carry any weight with a BC officer unless you are one of said EEs, so in practice you are right.